Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D04E818D2F for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 10:47:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 11492 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2015 10:47:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 11440 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2015 10:47:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 11429 invoked by uid 99); 8 Oct 2015 10:47:47 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd1-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 10:47:47 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 34CE8C49A6 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 10:47:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd1-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.989 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.989 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[HTML_MESSAGE=3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd1-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E1kMExtk_IaB for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 10:47:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.arhont.com (mail1.arhont.com [178.248.108.132]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id EFD56439EA for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 10:47:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail1.arhont.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22F9B9800C6 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:47:37 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail.arhont.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail1.arhont.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id a9mZ5zPHmqit for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:47:35 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail1.arhont.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF99798017B for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:47:35 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at arhont.com Received: from mail.arhont.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail1.arhont.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id phtm_ypGHE1e for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:47:35 +0100 (BST) Received: from mail1.arhont.com (mail1.arhont.com [178.248.108.132]) by mail1.arhont.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D73B9800C6 for ; Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:47:35 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 11:47:35 +0100 (BST) From: Andrei Mikhailovsky To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Message-ID: <15185564.595.1444301245415.JavaMail.andrei@tuchka> In-Reply-To: References: <5751743.14.1444143929810.JavaMail.andrei@tuchka> <1032805745.7910.1444151548754.JavaMail.zimbra@li.nux.ro> <331269696.7928.1444152706362.JavaMail.zimbra@li.nux.ro> <4926290.235.1444213732046.JavaMail.andrei@tuchka> <572191427.9232.1444240904506.JavaMail.zimbra@li.nux.ro> Subject: Re: poor screen resolution MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_594_7056378.1444301245414" X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.6.0_GA_1178 (Zimbra Desktop/7.2.7_12059_Linux) Thread-Topic: poor screen resolution Thread-Index: 2Hi47FU83EaHife2hZoSN8h+CHZ8SA== ------=_Part_594_7056378.1444301245414 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit thanks guys, the RDP is working okay with custom resolution. However, I can't achieve this with my Linux desktops, which is a majority. It is still poor at 1024x768. Any thoughts how to change that? thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrija Panic" To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 7 October, 2015 7:38:51 PM Subject: Re: poor screen resolution It should be god, Citrix's technology in RDP ;) On Oct 7, 2015 7:02 PM, "Nux!" wrote: > RDP in Windows 8.1+ has been improved quite a bit, almost as good as > XenDesktop. Then again I always had to use it over fast links, so no idea > how great it is with slower ones, but I'm sure it's more than decent. > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Andrei Mikhailovsky" > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > > Sent: Wednesday, 7 October, 2015 11:28:58 > > Subject: Re: poor screen resolution > > > Hi Nux, > > > > Thanks for your comments. The vms are started with default options that > > cloudstack uses when it starts guests. Is there a way to append "vga-std" > > option to a default start options set? If so, could you please let me > know how > > this could be done? > > > > I will try rdp and see if it works. Last time i've used rdp (probably > 3-4 years > > ago) I've had a pretty crap experience as everything was way too slow in > terms > > of response times to clicks, windows moves, etc. > > > > Cheers > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Nux!" > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > > Sent: Tuesday, 6 October, 2015 6:31:46 PM > > Subject: Re: poor screen resolution > > > > Andrei, > > > > Actually I just deployed a Windows VM and upon connecting to it via RDP, > it will > > use whatever resolution I tell it to (eg xfreerdp -g 1600x900); I'm sure > the > > Windows/Mac RDP client allows for this, too. > > > > I have not tried NoMachine or TeamViewer, RDP is your best bet. > > > > The console will allow me (windows 2012r2 guest) to set 1024x768 or > 1280x1024 > > (best). > > > > I think "vga -std" might help with this. Why not submit a feature > request? > > > > -- > > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > > > Nux! > > www.nux.ro > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Nux!" > >> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > >> Sent: Tuesday, 6 October, 2015 18:12:28 > >> Subject: Re: poor screen resolution > > > >> Hello Andrei, > >> > >> Are your guests started with "-vga std"? That enables you to use much > higher > >> resolutions. > >> Installing stuff inside the guest will not change anything without that. > >> > >> -- > >> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > >> > >> Nux! > >> www.nux.ro > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >>> From: "Andrei Mikhailovsky" > >>> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > >>> Sent: Tuesday, 6 October, 2015 16:03:58 > >>> Subject: poor screen resolution > >> > >>> Hi CloudStackers, > >>> > >>> I have been using ACS + KVM for several years and one of the annoying > problems > >>> that I have is the maximum screen resolution with my virtual machines. > The > >>> maximum that I get on both Windows and Linux vms is 1024x768, which > was okay > >>> about 10-15 years ago, but is less than ideal nowadays. I did install > virtual > >>> machine drivers (downloaded from Fedora) for my Windows vms, which has > done > >>> absolutely nothing to increase the maximum screen resolution. I have > tested > >>> both the native ACS console, the Teamviewer and NoMachine and all three > >>> graphical setups give me a maximum of 1024x768. > >>> > >>> Could someone please help me to increase the screen resolution to > something more > >>> usefull, like at least 1920x1080 or better? > >>> > >>> Many thanks > >>> > > > > Andrei > ------=_Part_594_7056378.1444301245414--