Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7970317665 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:18:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 16977 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2015 09:18:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 16925 invoked by uid 500); 30 Sep 2015 09:18:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 16913 invoked by uid 99); 30 Sep 2015 09:18:23 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:18:23 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 251AF180993 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:18:23 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 2.88 X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.88 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-eu-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v-yUXYG6PGHe for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:18:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-f42.google.com (mail-la0-f42.google.com [209.85.215.42]) by mx1-eu-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-eu-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id A3330209B7 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:18:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by laclj5 with SMTP id lj5so38415767lac.3 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 02:18:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=IvCqZW85fVX9FJKspONoLk6shFQFsqkl87YbgL3/lfg=; b=jsq1UCNyvdZC83t0w0e42kF3Jdqp4ugX2r2ZNTN/T2Wz4jWoCtKQAx1v8iWLRBnbVu QG12V6Hmriof6LLgH1TOBtQrhjCZJHdeEXNnMqgIhCO7NMaPzIAKWs0VGmoRDlSw2i37 7C5lm2pcGbxyFM2uGqdqAlex334YxT+uw/tuZLna95JvMpKz9NngTJIgvBWtb/F3BR4r NuU8OX5g0aGqsT8kxgjdDMduYE1ARwTch2cblIC/yXVUzRBBQ/voCDQ2YAjTyDJjEECa jKSOj9E0Ebbq1jw/sDoe+UPkHg3JSqvkbJdyhLP6ebBNhG3l8eFyqW+dvujBPhzZXmsx Bhow== X-Received: by 10.25.212.5 with SMTP id l5mr506352lfg.118.1443604695749; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 02:18:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.11.138 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Sep 2015 02:17:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1443541229.29318.23.camel@sseitz.office.heinlein-support.de> References: <1443541229.29318.23.camel@sseitz.office.heinlein-support.de> From: Daan Hoogland Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 11:17:56 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: blacklist IP addresses? To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1141292216204b0520f36924 --001a1141292216204b0520f36924 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Stephan, I am not sure how it works exactly but I think what you want is not provided. Can you add a jira ticket for it? I will be looking into IPv6 probably over the next period and we can always mark it unvalid or won't fix if needed. thanks, On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Stephan Seitz < s.seitz@secretresearchfacility.com> wrote: > Hi, > > we're currently adding IPv6 to some of our networks. Due to a design > decision we made to some part of our infrastructure to keep it HA, we > need to blacklist some particular addresses in the provided space. > > Is it possible to "blacklist" a few addresses, so the VR's dhcp6 won't > provide them? > > Indeed, even a /64 has a broad range of addresses and a conflict would > be very unlikely, but ... I'ld better be prepared :) > > I didn't find any self-descriptive table / field in the cloud-database, > so I'm quite unsure if it's possible at all. > > I'ld really appreciate any suggestions! > > Cheers, > > Stephan > > > -- Daan --001a1141292216204b0520f36924--