Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 796EB180CE for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 09:48:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 35657 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2015 09:48:11 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 35601 invoked by uid 500); 10 Aug 2015 09:48:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 35589 invoked by uid 99); 10 Aug 2015 09:48:11 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd4-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 09:48:11 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd4-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd4-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id C0916C0DF9 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 09:48:10 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd4-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 3.4 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.4 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=3, KAM_EU=0.5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd4-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-east.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd4-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.11]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BuJzf6rjFBAi for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 09:47:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-f44.google.com (mail-la0-f44.google.com [209.85.215.44]) by mx1-us-east.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-east.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 5D1F742BF9 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 09:47:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by lahi9 with SMTP id i9so20196969lah.2 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 02:47:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=PbWS8ksGbLNGjwyjqU++g+ie1/eP5EnMVQ3jw86mDic=; b=fyaWWA7SnAj50DAWKJ3oTb57Pk+rTpY89rdubQIxmr2Hdkg6dFmuIuVnS4fXqsY0O1 y655CW/6FNlssTcqW5pshXH5j6guOC2XUj5ckWmiinKrAyk+OINv/1IbXId4AYF0FcZl oGVGxBqKiccwZkZy4swKGc+BmsudjSACXLZUzhYnEY4tGm3BknHVR70jMT7OQ/VU7DnN LkLIT+SXhSC8Tu2sZxGxg+1QqrhJVEy9MeRCPvFZxCFPqFaK+gpOTJ3e9ZOuQk2yCPX+ dU9yv2mOCCtEtpZ301OQlpltL6+t1fyMwi5RYossqU+bZtnk5J91Tn3ab3IIjzvGD2W2 +BUQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.120.198 with SMTP id le6mr19232277lab.38.1439200068745; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 02:47:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.247.68 with HTTP; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 02:47:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <32F036C3-E171-44C9-BC16-0EBF3E0CB4B5@schubergphilis.com> Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 15:17:48 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: cloudstack and vmware production? From: Tejas Sheth To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01176905dbc10a051cf1e024 --089e01176905dbc10a051cf1e024 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Thanks for the confirmation guyz, I will go with 4.5.1 as deployment. Yes, We are going to use Distributed vSwitchs. Thanks, Tejas On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 2:55 PM, Timothy Lothering < tlothering@datacentrix.co.za> wrote: > Hi Tejas, > > I second the below, If you can wait for 4.5.2, then do. 4.3 has been great > but there have been several enhancements in 4.5. > > If you need to deploy now, then go with 4.5.1. You can do in-place > upgrades to 4.5.2. 4.3 --> 4.5 is a much larger upgrade and involves DB > version upgrades etc. > > Also, are you planning on using Distributed vSwitches? > > Kind Regards, > > Timothy Lothering > Timothy Lothering > Solutions Architect > Managed Services > > T: +27877415535 > F: +27877415100 > C: +27824904099 > E: tlothering@datacentrix.co.za > > > DISCLAIMER NOTICE: > > Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relating to the official > business of Datacentrix Holdings Ltd. and its subsidiaries > ('Datacentrix') is proprietary to Datacentrix. It is confidential, legally > privileged and protected by law. Datacentrix does not > own and endorse any other content. Views and opinions are those of the > sender unless clearly stated as being that of Datacentrix. > The person addressed in the e-mail is the sole authorised recipient. > Please notify the sender immediately if it has unintentionally > reached you and do not read, disclose or use the content in any way. > Datacentrix cannot assure that the integrity of this communication > has been maintained nor that it is free of errors, virus, interception or > interference. > -----Original Message----- > From: Remi Bergsma [mailto:RBergsma@schubergphilis.com] > Sent: Saturday, 08 August 2015 1:01 PM > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: RE: cloudstack and vmware production? > > Hi Tejas, > > I wouldn't recommend using 4.3.x for a new deployment. Even 4.4.x has been > superseded by ACS 4.5. In fact, 4.5.2 will be released soon. A RC is > expected in about a week and since some of us already run this in > production, I think we can release it soon. If you still want to use 4.4, > go for 4.4.4 (the latest release of 4.4). At work we run this in production > and it is great. Although we're working towards upgrading to newer > versions. Long story short: if you start, get the newest version that gets > a lot of attention and is still maintained. Right now, this is 4.5.x. > > You can get 4.5.1 here: > http://cloudstack.apt-get.eu/centos/4.5/ > > This is what will be 4.5.2 soon: > http://jenkins.buildacloud.org/view/4.5/job/package-rhel63-4.5/ > > If you encounter problems, let us know on dev@cloudstack.apache.org > > Regards, > Remi > > -----Original Message----- > From: Tejas Sheth [mailto:tsheth.p@gmail.com] > Sent: zaterdag 8 augustus 2015 11:11 > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: cloudstack and vmware production? > > Thanks Remi. > > Hi Timothy, > > I would kink to know more of your VMware setup. > 1) Are you using CS 4.3.1 or 4.4.1. > 2) Have you faced any integration related issues in your VMware setup > with CS? > 3) Are you using NFS or iSCSI as primary storage in VMware vsphere? > 4) are you using advanced networking? > > Thanks > Tejas > > On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:47 PM, Timothy Lothering < > tlothering@datacentrix.co.za> wrote: > > > Hello Remi, > > > > We use VMware ESXi 5.5 U2 (March 2015 Build), not NSX, we use DVS and > SVS. > > Works like a charm. I also recommend you use VMXNET3 & SCSI > > Controllers on your OS Templates. > > > > One downside of VMware vs XenServer 6.2 (We run both), VMware takes > > around 20min to deploy a 100GB VM, CXS takes about 5 min. > > > > Kind Regards, > > > > Timothy Lothering > > Timothy Lothering > > Solutions Architect > > Managed Services > > > > T: +27877415535 > > F: +27877415100 > > C: +27824904099 > > E: tlothering@datacentrix.co.za > > > > > > DISCLAIMER NOTICE: > > > > Everything in this e-mail and any attachments relating to the official > > business of Datacentrix Holdings Ltd. and its subsidiaries > > ('Datacentrix') is proprietary to Datacentrix. It is confidential, > > legally privileged and protected by law. Datacentrix does not own and > > endorse any other content. Views and opinions are those of the sender > > unless clearly stated as being that of Datacentrix. > > The person addressed in the e-mail is the sole authorised recipient. > > Please notify the sender immediately if it has unintentionally reached > > you and do not read, disclose or use the content in any way. > > Datacentrix cannot assure that the integrity of this communication has > > been maintained nor that it is free of errors, virus, interception or > > interference. > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tejas Sheth [mailto:tsheth.p@gmail.com] > > Sent: Saturday, 08 August 2015 10:06 AM > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org > > Subject: Re: cloudstack and vmware production? > > > > Hello Remi, > > > > Anyway VMware hypervisor is a business decision. but I will definitely > > look in to KVM based nested hypervisor too. > > > > What is your qemu version? > > Have you tried vmware esxi as nested hypervisor? > > > > Thanks, > > Tejas > > > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Remi Bergsma > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi Tejas, > > > > > > We do nested virtualization on KVM (based on CentOS 7.1). Never > > > tried Hyper-v, but all other hypervisors work fine nested on KVM. > > > > > > Regards, Remi > > > > > > > On 08 Aug 2015, at 09:32, Tejas Sheth wrote: > > > > > > > > I am a big fan of kvm and xenserver too. > > > > In our requirement few account requires nested virtualization > > > > (hyper-v) > > > for > > > > lab setup. Which need to be provisioned from cloudstack. Thats The > > > > reason behind vmware hypervisor. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Tejas > > > >> On Aug 8, 2015 12:37 PM, "Remi Bergsma" > > > >> > > > wrote: > > > >> > > > >> Hi, > > > >> > > > >> I can only comment on the NSX part, as we do not use VMware as a > > > >> hypervisor in production. > > > >> > > > >> NSX-mh is well supported, we run 1000s of VMs on KVM/XenServer > > > >> with NSX since 2012 and it rocks. VMware NSX-vsphere is not > > > >> supported, this is a different product. > > > >> > > > >> May I ask why you didn't consider KVM or XenServer? Many people > > > >> in the community use this so getting help should be easy. > > > >> > > > >> But VMware as a hypervisor is supported. Maybe someone that runs > > > >> this > > > can > > > >> share some thoughts/tips? > > > >> > > > >> Regards, Remi > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>> On 08 Aug 2015, at 08:44, Tejas Sheth wrote: > > > >>> > > > >>> Hello, > > > >>> > > > >>> We are planing to deploy cloudstack in production with VMware > > > >>> and cloudstack in large scale production environment (100+ > > > >>> accounts with > > > 200+ > > > >>> VMS) with advanced networking . > > > >>> > > > >>> We have evaluated multiple hypervisor and we have finalized > > > >>> VMware vsphere as hypervisor layer. I have following queries > > > >>> regarding > > > >> stability. > > > >>> > > > >>> 1) which vmware version and cloudstack version is integrates and > > > >>> maintains stability > > > >>> > > > >>> 2) does anyone has tested VMware NSX with cloudstack? > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> Really appreciate your advice in advance. > > > >>> > > > >>> Thanks, > > > >>> Tejas > > > >> > > > > > > --089e01176905dbc10a051cf1e024--