cloudstack-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jan-Arve Nygård <jan.arve.nyg...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Console Improvements
Date Thu, 07 May 2015 14:02:08 GMT
I agree, improved console would be very welcome and would increase the
end-user experience as you say.

-thinktwo

2015-05-07 15:54 GMT+02:00 Ronalds D <ronismc@gmail.com>:

> Hi,
> AFAIK they - Proxmox, SolusVM and others are using noVNC HTML5
> implementation, it is pretty fast and works fine. Btw, it is opensource.
> Link to the noVNC github: https://github.com/kanaka/noVNC
> It could be a nice feature for Cloudstack.
>
> On 7 May 2015 at 16:48, Alessandro Caviglione <c.alessandro@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> > I'm using CS 4.4.2 and i just want to know if there is a chance to
> improve
> > the current console.
> > I do not want to denigrate the work of developers because I love
> CloudStack
> > and I think it's very undervalued compared to other competitors ... but
> the
> > console is really bad.
> > Any other product has a better console: Proxmox, SolusVM, Euchalyptus,
> etc
> > ...
> > I know that compared to the entire ecosystem of CloudStack the console
> is a
> > small piece of the puzzle, but it's the piece that the end user sees
> first.
> > The console is virtually unusable performing an installation from ISO,
> the
> > characters are not transferred properly, when you reboot an instance the
> > console goes in Access Denied and you have to re-open, while using it
> there
> > is a continuous flapping of the screen.
> > So the user have to open the SSH or RDP ports to the Internet to connect
> > directly to his instance and work better ... reducing security and
> > increasing the user inconvenience.
> > Is there any chance of improvement?
> >
> > Thank you very much
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message