Mailing-List: contact users-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: message received from 54.76.25.247 which
 is an MX secondary for users@cloudstack.apache.org)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAB6y=052Tk93R0miiu4eWxJ77am7Oh-HYh3ts_C1CTFTS99ybw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAB7j8cWZE0+r1q4t_2HaM6wFjgCmvHVAL0-bgAvDyRVSSFp0OA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAB6y=052Tk93R0miiu4eWxJ77am7Oh-HYh3ts_C1CTFTS99ybw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2015 07:50:14 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAB7j8cXOyo0CSj8fCAOt8F7taWsF0JrU8gYgwq3gO8hPH3e=Rg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: cloudstack kvm openvswitch
From: Ignazio Cassano <ignaziocassano@gmail.com>
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c3cdbc614b78051471f879

--001a11c3cdbc614b78051471f879
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Thanks a lot.
What I need to know is how I must prepare kvm nodes for openvswitch: for
example if I must create a gre tunnel between nodes or if it is enough
adding an address on each openvswitch  bridge.
Regards
Il giorno 24/apr/2015 06:22, "Sanjeev N" <sanjeev@apache.org> ha scritto:

> Hi ,
>
> We can't avoid configuring vlans on physical switched even if we use OVS
> instead of bridge more on KVM. One option would be to use GRE isolation
> instead of VLAN based in creating Physical network in a zone.
>
> -Sanjeev
>
> On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 4:05 PM, Ignazio Cassano <ignaziocassano@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > I would like to install a new cloudstack infrastracture with kvm nodes
> but
> > I also would like to use OVS to configure guests vlan avoiding to
> configure
> > them on
> > physical switches.
> > I am planning to user three kvm nodes but I do not know how prepare them
> to
> > use OVS: must I create a gre tunnel between nodes ?
> > Regards
> >
>

--001a11c3cdbc614b78051471f879--