cloudstack-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Agent deleting/stoping main bridge on Linux ???
Date Wed, 04 Mar 2015 16:19:11 GMT
Thanks Markus - yes don't ask me why I did name bridge like this... so this
is obviously unsuported scenario, that I did... crap...

Thx again.

On 4 March 2015 at 17:16, Marcus <shadowsor@gmail.com> wrote:

> I don't think anyone has ever tested what would happen if the admin
> has manually defined the same guest bridges that CloudStack wants to
> use. CloudStack creates them on the fly and deletes them when the last
> VM has been removed. I assume you're using these bridges on the host
> for something out of band that CloudStack isn't aware of?
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Andrija Panic <andrija.panic@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I forgot to add - this is ACS 4.3.0 and CentOS 6.x... breth1-500 is the
> > main bridge used for Shared Network (yes, I know, somewhat confusing name
> > for the bridge...)
> >
> > On 4 March 2015 at 17:07, Andrija Panic <andrija.panic@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi people.
> >>
> >> on physical host, I was having breth1-500(bridge) with eth1(joined to
> this
> >> bridge) - all defined manually in Centos network config files.
> >> (when you boot physical host - this bridge is active of course)
> >>
> >> When I deploy new VM with Shared Network with vlan 500, new device is
> >> created eth1.500 and joined to this bridge - which is fine, and then
> vnet0
> >> device from VM is also joined to the bridge...
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> When I stop the last VM that is using this Shared Network, CloudStack
> >> (agent?) removes eth1.500 from bridge (fine with me), and ***then
> removed
> >> eth1 from bridge (which I manually configured !!!) and later
> stoped/removed
> >> the whole bridge***
> >>
> >> If you try to start new VM again (joined to Shared Network with vlan
> 500)
> >> - then no bridge is available, VM is started, but no vnet device, no
> >> breth1-500 bridge up, and no eth1.500 up.
> >> No bridge was available - but also bridge was not created on the fly...
> >>
> >>
> >> Is there any explanation - why the heck would my manually configured
> >> bridge get deleted?
> >>
> >> --
> >>
> >> Andrija Panić
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Andrija Panić
>



-- 

Andrija Panić

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message