cloudstack-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sanjeev N <sanj...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Non-RFC1918 Guest Network
Date Mon, 30 Mar 2015 04:46:43 GMT
Do you want to use the same Public CIDR for both public and guest traffic?
If yes, it is not allowed.

On Sun, Mar 29, 2015 at 9:43 PM, Sam Ceylani <sam@mistercertified.com>
wrote:

> I tried to create a shared network with Public IPs and on that web form
> only "Guest" xenserver network label is available. Our Public network is
> Is on "Public" label, is there a workaround for this problem, I checked
> api solution but I couldn’t resolve it, ty
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sanjeev N [mailto:sanjeev@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2015 2:47 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Non-RFC1918 Guest Network
>
> The expectation is that in advanced zone we will be using private CIDRs.
> That's why it is not allowing. If you don't want to use NAT you can create
> shared network with your CIDR and deploy VMS in it On Mar 27, 2015 9:25 PM,
> "Valdinei Rodrigues dos Reis" <nei@unesp.br> wrote:
>
> > Hi there.
> >
> > My company has a policy anti-NAT, so I need to allocate public prefix
> > for use in my guest network.
> >
> > The problem is that Cloudstack 4.3 does not allow a non-RFC1918 prefix
> > in zone creation.
> >
> > What am i doing wrong? Or is a CS "feature"?
> >
> > Thanks in advance and best regards.
> >
> >
> > Valdinei Rodrigues
> > nei@unesp.br
> > (11)5627-0467
> >
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message