Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5DDB17A26 for ; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 23:42:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 66448 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2014 23:42:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 66392 invoked by uid 500); 3 Nov 2014 23:42:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 66380 invoked by uid 99); 3 Nov 2014 23:42:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 23:42:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of motty.cruz@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.181 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.181] (HELO mail-ig0-f181.google.com) (209.85.213.181) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 23:42:27 +0000 Received: by mail-ig0-f181.google.com with SMTP id l13so6103398iga.8 for ; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 15:41:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=LtQ7HVhPMMItE/AEOibxznNIUvq1q3/Zza6K7rh7k5s=; b=ERnmPDdOTLJmiJgqXkcjpe5N+VfXZ7JeKCknFzXU4ZPdwhkMhIg5p05q1XBYR8YrAG 5rVVL4h4K49jRktBxPpwLzfF+jigbhMp0HrvjOLM026Gh2PlKtLFVRe1ztSoIa/Ur3ck q/MAKbNsdlBmbmkhO3z/MYou8mh3S6AKlXBiCMZxgV2o4RhCz3ATPYuygBLt412P04m9 p+AE6xsuG/Rs1VnGZu62LGWXnWSMMKizzSKv67tqlybncvHvw5+1DpX0s/pS0FMN34/1 ALU+efsMBcUOK5ZhDYQekh1kWrnL6aJ9jPmcoZZboSa59eL6vf9Sf10rABWKgce+cmgX 6+lA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.16.19 with SMTP id y19mr5009783ioi.77.1415058110820; Mon, 03 Nov 2014 15:41:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.43.170 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Nov 2014 15:41:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 15:41:50 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cloudstack Secondary Storage filling up From: motty cruz To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113fd1ea08598c0506fce4bb X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a113fd1ea08598c0506fce4bb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Thanks Abhlsek, I only have one snapshot in the Snapshot directory and is only 40GB. Thanks, Motty On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 3:32 PM, abhisek basu wrote: > Do you have many snapshots for large volumes? Please check snapshot > directory in side secondary storage as well. > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On 4 Nov 2014, at 4:13 am, "motty cruz" wrote: > > > > yes that is correct! I only have 6 ISOs but the secondary storage is 79% > > full out of 1TB I have 200GB of free space. > > > > when I execute "du -h" 16G ./219 > > but when I execute command "ls" I don't see anything > > so I did " ls -la" I see a hidden file > > 265]# ls -la > > total 13134948 > > drwxrwxrwx 2 root root 4096 Sep 30 14:19 . > > drwxrwxrwx 62 root root 4096 Nov 3 14:41 .. > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 13450174464 Sep 30 14:21 > > .nfs0000000003f4007500000013 > > > > so I am asking if this file is OK to delete. > > > > Thanks in advance! > > Motty > > > > On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 2:30 PM, Andrija Panic > > wrote: > > > >> If they are completely empty - yes. But what is the point with deleting > the > >> empty folders? And dont really understand your original issue ? You > said > >> you have only 6 isos but storage is 79%full ? > >>> On Nov 3, 2014 11:04 PM, "motty cruz" wrote: > >>> > >>> Thanks Andrija, > >>> some of the folders seem to be empty: > >>> 2]# du -h | less > >>> 16G ./280 > >>> > >>> [root@debka 2]# cd 280 > >>> [root@debka 280]# ls > >>> [root@debka 280]# ls > >>> > >>> > >>> [root@deba 2]# pwd > >>> /export/secondary/template/tmpl/2 > >>> [root@deba 2]# ls > >>> 202 209 214 218 221 225 238 241 244 247 250 254 257 261 > 264 > >>> 267 271 278 282 287 292 > >>> 207 212 216 219 222 227 239 242 245 248 252 255 259 262 > 265 > >>> 269 272 280 283 288 293 > >>> 208 213 217 220 224 230 240 243 246 249 253 256 260 263 > 266 > >>> 270 276 281 286 289 294 > >>> [root@deba 2]# > >>> > >>> should I delete them? > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Andrija Panic > > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> There is template.properties file inside each template folder - you > can > >>>> read these and get information for each template..,and choose which > one > >>> to > >>>> delete....these folders/templates seems like they all belong to > >> different > >>>> accounts inside same domain - too much folders if you really have only > >> 6 > >>>> isos... > >>>>> On Nov 3, 2014 10:33 PM, "motty cruz" wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hello, > >>>>> I have a 1TB of secondary Storage which is 79% used but I only have 6 > >>>> ISOs > >>>>> and 3 templates. I am using XenServer 6.2. > >>>>> > >>>>> Secondary Storage is a NFS server: du -h > >>>>> 16G ./template/tmpl/2/239 > >>>>> 16G ./template/tmpl/2/218 > >>>>> 7.5G ./template/tmpl/2/282 > >>>>> 16G ./template/tmpl/2/245 > >>>>> 16G ./template/tmpl/2/246 > >>>>> 13G ./template/tmpl/2/271 > >>>>> 7.5G ./template/tmpl/2/257 > >>>>> 2.5G ./template/tmpl/2/288 > >>>>> 399M ./template/tmpl/2/209 > >>>>> 12G ./template/tmpl/2/254 > >>>>> 16G ./template/tmpl/2/238 > >>>>> 16G ./template/tmpl/2/261 > >>>>> 16G ./template/tmpl/2/243 > >>>>> 12G ./template/tmpl/2/252 > >>>>> 16G ./template/tmpl/2/267 > >>>>> 13G ./template/tmpl/2/270 > >>>>> 12G ./template/tmpl/2/250 > >>>>> 13G ./template/tmpl/2/272 > >>>>> 16G ./template/tmpl/2/214 > >>>>> 16G ./template/tmpl/2/230 > >>>>> 13G ./template/tmpl/2/266 > >>>>> 16G ./template/tmpl/2/292 > >>>>> 16G ./template/tmpl/2/278 > >>>>> 16G ./template/tmpl/2/240 > >>>>> 16G ./template/tmpl/2/213 > >>>>> 13G ./template/tmpl/2/269 > >>>>> 7.5G ./template/tmpl/2/256 > >>>>> 11G ./template/tmpl/2/264 > >>>>> 1.4G ./template/tmpl/2/294 > >>>>> 744G ./template/tmpl/2 > >>>>> 750G ./template/tmpl > >>>>> 750G ./template > >>>>> 4.0K ./volumes > >>>>> 750G . > >>>>> > >>>>> would it be safe to delete some of this templates manaully? if yes > >> how > >>>> can > >>>>> I identified a replicated templates and delete them? > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Thanks for your support, > >>>>> Motty > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Thanks for your support, > >>> Motty > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks for your support, > > Motty > -- Thanks for your support, Motty --001a113fd1ea08598c0506fce4bb--