cloudstack-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: CephFS vs. GFS2
Date Tue, 04 Nov 2014 08:10:22 GMT
Officially, CephFS is NOT production ready - that being said by the Intank
- you get your answer :)

On 4 November 2014 08:21, Stephan Seitz <s.seitz@secretresearchfacility.com>
wrote:

> Am Dienstag, den 04.11.2014, 09:07 +0200 schrieb Vladimir Melnik:
> > Dear colleagues,
> >
> > Did anyone compare CephFS and GFS2 or did anyone read any articles about
> > comparison of CephFS and GFS2 in regard to their performance? Alas, I
> > haven't found anything on this topic.
> >
> > Right now I'm using GFS2 as a primary storage filesystem (it's
> > accessible by iSCSI+multipath), but, of course, I'd like to gain more
> > performance. Should I try CephFS as an alternative?
>
> Both techniques are quite different. In short, you shouldn't use CephFS
> in favor of ceph's native RBD.
>
> I'll try to follow up later that day - currently in a hurry.
>
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
>
>


-- 

Andrija Panić
--------------------------------------
  http://admintweets.com
--------------------------------------

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message