Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4B65C111B1 for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 13:23:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58979 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2014 13:23:32 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 58937 invoked by uid 500); 19 Aug 2014 13:23:32 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 57985 invoked by uid 99); 19 Aug 2014 13:23:32 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 13:23:32 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of nux@li.nux.ro designates 31.193.175.196 as permitted sender) Received: from [31.193.175.196] (HELO mailserver.lastdot.org) (31.193.175.196) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 13:23:06 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mailserver.lastdot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 673A22A630B; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:19:08 +0100 (BST) Received: from mailserver.lastdot.org ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mailserver.lastdot.org [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id 1f-cQW84FJFK; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:19:07 +0100 (BST) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mailserver.lastdot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5263F2A630D; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:19:07 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.0 mailserver.lastdot.org 5263F2A630D DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=li.nux.ro; s=C605E3A6-F3C6-11E3-AEB0-DFF9218DCAC4; t=1408454347; bh=qp8aCgkN5dkjpz9EVKBqlOitGCvYoUXsQfGKqD5+fDw=; h=Date:From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Mt21DLuzq8VFyXpAu4FZcQNZwIDrTMIp9c6qv6lLiufHujy6FHRE0U2lpGEobI53Q sqTa9DOhZGzQAzTawIVkTyJRLtGl4KYqvN+pmuWbdPznc3qb7lrxQPMM9Szs+AWvfh aTWnqu8HwVFwWmMe/L6TD5gDptQZWPH1fPKo1/fk= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mailserver.lastdot.org Received: from mailserver.lastdot.org ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mailserver.lastdot.org [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id 9yt5HgChNDF0; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:19:07 +0100 (BST) Received: from mailserver.lastdot.org (mailserver.lastdot.org [31.193.175.196]) by mailserver.lastdot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B21A2A630B; Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:19:07 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2014 14:19:06 +0100 (BST) From: Nux! To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org Message-ID: <746042909.73281.1408454346757.JavaMail.zimbra@li.nux.ro> In-Reply-To: <466B7C8C2F98DC4A9C527F2DA9D31CC55CCFF951@SBPOMB401.sbp.lan> References: <975735633.73185.1408446751396.JavaMail.zimbra@li.nux.ro> <325624325.73228.1408451121286.JavaMail.zimbra@li.nux.ro> <466B7C8C2F98DC4A9C527F2DA9D31CC55CCFF951@SBPOMB401.sbp.lan> Subject: Re: VRouter sets the same public IP on 2 interfaces MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.0.7_GA_6021 (ZimbraWebClient - FF24 (Linux)/8.0.7_GA_6021) Thread-Topic: VRouter sets the same public IP on 2 interfaces Thread-Index: Ac+7q8ylD1Fg97WKQZirdCffVtByPFVHYiE/ X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi, No, they are entirely different ranges and physical links. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ian Southam" > To: "dev" , users@cloudstack.apache.org > Sent: Tuesday, 19 August, 2014 1:47:57 PM > Subject: RE: VRouter sets the same public IP on 2 interfaces > > Have you used the same address range for your public network as your > management? > > -- > Ian > > -----Original Message----- > From: Nux! [mailto:nux@li.nux.ro] > Sent: dinsdag 19 augustus 2014 14:25 > To: dev; users@cloudstack.apache.org > Subject: Re: VRouter sets the same public IP on 2 interfaces > > Right, so the SNAT on the VR is done on eth3 instead of eth2, not sure why > this is happening. Can't spot anything dodgy in the logs. > Once I remove the SNAT and add it on the eth2 (which has the same IP) then > all my egress rules start to work again. > > I'll try to recreate the zone and hope this glitch goes away. > > > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > Nux! > www.nux.ro > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Nux!" > > To: "dev" , users@cloudstack.apache.org > > Sent: Tuesday, 19 August, 2014 12:12:31 PM > > Subject: VRouter sets the same public IP on 2 interfaces > > > > Hi, > > > > I have 4 networks defined (public, guest, storage and mgmt). It looks > > like the VR sets up two internal NIcs (eth2 and eth3) for connecting > > to the public network. It also sets the same IP address on them. > > Egress = Allow is also ignored and my VMs can't reach anything. > > > > Has anyone seen this before? I'm on 4.3 > > > > Thanks > > > > -- > > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! > > > > Nux! > > www.nux.ro > > > > >