Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 85AD711610 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 17:07:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 50309 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2014 17:07:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 50255 invoked by uid 500); 18 Aug 2014 17:07:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 49806 invoked by uid 99); 18 Aug 2014 17:07:18 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 17:07:18 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of creategui@gmail.com designates 209.85.192.169 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.192.169] (HELO mail-pd0-f169.google.com) (209.85.192.169) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 17:06:54 +0000 Received: by mail-pd0-f169.google.com with SMTP id y10so7947802pdj.14 for ; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:06:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=AXs/MjZ6qxKVcGX8EiUgzl195BF8+F91ehphQZZikJc=; b=bkRHzVznGQVstd7b+AgJy/AcN9LKNH0L/VjlQ8HhzpU24CcRn19BgPtGktjkUqb34h APekFu6reGpaJEycwK3aDlTm9Q21ktB8P6cYTBkR/TeGbRWNUaXQgh7yIDSFicohxmHI f1z8dVuw6BHlboYanf5dlQ1ip0Sk+opb/bjhgL2Vc+MFurnPgX2aNNWKgVNFaRl9PhzK 2mCo8s8++18r9cLzxSAc/NY9h4wxdq0yQc/TKo9yl8YfHkujmVx+f2ozo+4W7cfNQmyT wd3vljThjTUSFN05QxlzNUXk876/Nu6lRuFmPG0i7J9034uDAVNJT0dtS51jj6HX/doV nsIg== X-Received: by 10.70.93.8 with SMTP id cq8mr2004182pdb.160.1408381611532; Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:06:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.13.50] (142-254-22-7.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net. [142.254.22.7]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ey10sm25536597pdb.50.2014.08.18.10.06.49 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:06:50 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.3 \(1878.6\)) Subject: Re: Disk performance From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Carlos_Re=E1tegui?= In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2014 10:06:48 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <49456FD8-BE1C-4E4D-92EF-1F5EB366760A@gmail.com> References: To: users@cloudstack.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org What is your network setup? =20 On Aug 18, 2014, at 10:04 AM, Jeff Crystal wrote: > No, I need a shared storage solution. I'm wondering what others are = using in place of NFS. OCFS2? GFS2? GlusterFS? I tried setting up = CLVM, but it seems very problematic (server won't shut down without = manual intervention to leave the cluster, server won't join the cluster = on boot without manual commands. Not very enterprisey!) I'll have to = give Ceph a look... >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemneina@gmail.com]=20 > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 11:52 AM > To: Cloudstack users mailing list > Subject: Re: Disk performance >=20 > local storage is probably your most performant storage type... you = dont get the awesome of HA or easy volume recovery, but if all youre = after is performance. Thats the one. >=20 >=20 > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 8:47 AM, Randy Smith = wrote: >=20 >> Jeff, >>=20 >> I'm a big fan of ceph for clustered storage for block devices. >>=20 >> Beyond that, there are a bunch of crazy things you can do to tune NFS=20= >> but it's rarely worth it. >>=20 >>=20 >> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Jeff Crystal >> wrote: >>=20 >>> Anyone have any suggestions for improving disk performance with=20 >>> Cloudstack and KVM? Using NFS is pretty craptastic, even with=20 >>> dedicated network adapters and switches for storage traffic. >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>> [image: JCrystal Signature2013-1] >>>=20 >>>=20 >>>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> -- >> Randall Smith >> Computing Services >> Adams State University >> http://www.adams.edu/ >> 719-587-7741 >>=20