Mailing-List: contact users-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-ID: <53BB9A49.6040600@avcosystems.com>
Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2014 08:14:17 +0100
From: Elliot Berg <elliot.berg@avcosystems.com>
User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.11 (Windows/20140602)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: InsufficientServerCapacityException - Unsure Why
References: <53B3BD98.7050305@avcosystems.com> <53B468A7.9020007@gmail.com>
 <53B51A20.8090800@avcosystems.com> <53B51B8E.8030804@avcosystems.com>
 <53BA5ECC.9020306@avcosystems.com>
 <CC9D6362-F16C-4B10-94EA-B19210BD5DD0@citrix.com>
 <53BAA349.9060008@avcosystems.com>
 <51968F56-BF03-44E5-A05B-63A2DECEB1D0@citrix.com>
In-Reply-To: <51968F56-BF03-44E5-A05B-63A2DECEB1D0@citrix.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="------------000005010209080705060302"

--------------000005010209080705060302
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Hi,

It appears to be stuck in the "starting" state - so I don't get the 
option to reboot it or anything. If I change the state to stopped in the 
database directly will the management server attempt to start it again 
or do I need to do something more?

Thanks!

Elliot

Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
> Is your Virtual Router up and running ? If is in running state you can mark it Done and deploy a VM.
> If it is in stopped state try restarting it. You can try updating the field as well.
>
> -Harikrishna
>
> On 07-Jul-2014, at 7:10 pm, Elliot Berg<elliot.berg@avcosystems.com>  wrote:
>
>> I can see two entries that have the "step" field set to something other than "Done", one of them is
>>
>> ConsoleProxy | Starting
>>
>> and the other is
>>
>> DomainRouter | Prepare
>>
>> Am I safe to just delete the rows, or should I just update the field?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Elliot
>>
>> Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>>> Do you see any work item pending for Virtual Router r-4-VM in �op_it_work� table ?
>>> If there are any, remove those entries and try VM deployment again.
>>>
>>> I see in the logs that VR has a task pending
>>> 2014-07-07 10:28:15,934 WARN  [cloud.vm.VirtualMachineManagerImpl] (Job-Executor-5:job-48 = [ 22369802-b5aa-4b5a-a26d-1fab11241551 ]) The task item for vm VM[DomainRouter|r-4-VM] has been inactive for 418531
>>>
>>>
>>> -Harikrishna
>>>
>>>
>>> On 07-Jul-2014, at 2:18 pm, Elliot Berg<elliot.berg@avcosystems.com<mailto:elliot.berg@avcosystems.com>>   wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm still not really spotting anything indicating why it's not using the host, but I suspect that's just because I don't really know what I'm looking for - so I've zipped the whole log for today and stuffed it on dropbox at https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/47728104/management-server.log.gz.
>>>
>>> Hopefully someone who's used cloudstack a lot more will have more success!
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Elliot
>>>
>>>
>>> Elliot Berg wrote:
>>> I'm going back over everything and I've noticed something else - everywhere I've looked for how to use local storage says I should change two global settings;
>>>
>>>
>>>    *   system.vm.use.local.storage = true
>>>    *   use.local.storage = true
>>>
>>> However I'm looking at my global settings and only the first exists (which I have set to true).
>>>
>>> Elliot
>>>
>>> Elliot Berg wrote:
>>> Ah, so when looking back a bit further before (I was kind of only looking for exceptions higher up before now), I've just spotted this...
>>>
>>> 2014-07-03 10:48:28,765 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-3:job-46 = [ 92fb959d-edc5-4fe2-84a0-5
>>> 6001226e4ac ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Looking for speed=1000Mhz, Ram=1024
>>> 2014-07-03 10:48:28,765 DEBUG [allocator.impl.FirstFitAllocator] (Job-Executor-3:job-46 = [ 92fb959d-edc5-4fe2-84a0-5
>>> 6001226e4ac ] FirstFitRoutingAllocator) Host name: cloudstack-host1, hostId: 1 is in avoid set, skipping this and try
>>> ing other available hosts
>>>
>>> That's the one and only host - so I'm guessing that has something to do with it!
>>>
>>> Elliot
>>> --
>>> Elliot Berg  |  Analyst Programmer/Network Team
>>> Email:  elliot.berg@avcosystems.com<mailto:elliot.berg@avcosystems.com>   | Tel: 01753 213700 | Web:  www.avcosystems.com<http://www.avcosystems.com/>
>>> <image.png>
>>>
>>> Avco Systems Ltd, Registered in England&   Wales, Registration Number 1976620
>>> Registered Office: Avco Systems | 17 Bath Road | Slough | SL1 3UF
>>>
>>>
>>> ilya musayev wrote:
>>> Elliot,
>>>
>>> When you see such an error - there usually a predecessor message that says CloudStack checked for X, Y and Z and found no suitable resources based on your configuration.
>>>
>>> Put the logs on pastebin or some other site (strip out any private info you dont want to share). I would also  recommend cloudstack 4.3.1 (which is not officially out yet) but should come thru in the next several weeks. Its latest stable release of CloudStack 4.3.0 - with latest bug fixes.
>>>
>>> I've put a build for folks who want to try it out until we complete official release of ACS 4.3.1 process.
>>>
>>> Unzip tgz and it should have required RPMs with both Open Source and Non-Open Source modules.
>>>
>>> http://www.cloudsand.com/cloudstack-4.3.0-1.tgz
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> ilya
>>>
>>>
>>> On 7/2/14, 1:06 AM, Elliot Berg wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I've been putting together a cloudstack set-up for experimentation purposes - right now we're just trying to compare different platforms for private cloud infrastructure before we start getting too in depth with any of them.
>>>
>>> I've added the cloudstack 4.2 apt repository, and I'm running on Ubuntu 12.04 LTS, and I believe I've followed all the installation guides correctly at the various stages.
>>>
>>> We've set up a management server, which is also an NFS server, however we're interested in using local storage for the majority of things, and have also set up a single KVM host which I believe is all configured correctly to use local storage. If I look at the dashboard, I'm told I have more than enough resource in every section to create an instance the size I want to - which is a small offering I've created with just 1.0GHz and 1GB of RAM, with local storage. The host's not very powerful, but according to the dashboard I am using 1.50GHz/5.87GHz, 1.38GB/7.80GB, 3.55GB/285.95GB Secondary Storage, 1.03GB/450.99GB Local Storage and 0.00KB/571.90GB Primary Storage (I'm assuming that's meant to be a combination of the NFS server's primary storage offering and the local storage on the host, though the numbers don't quite make sense at first glance).
>>>
>>> However, when I try to add an instance, I receive an InsufficientServerCapacityException and I'm struggling to work out why. I can't add an instance using a small shared storage offering either, but if I'm not mistaken that's expected because the zone and host are configured to use local storage. The only thing I can think of is that the local storage isn't properly configured, but when I've looked it seems to be.
>>>
>>> Any pointers for how I can further diagnose this would be great - thanks in advance!
>>>
>>> Elliot
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>

--------------000005010209080705060302--