Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1D80F1007C for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 14:43:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 81568 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2014 14:43:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 81100 invoked by uid 500); 6 Feb 2014 14:43:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 81079 invoked by uid 99); 6 Feb 2014 14:43:53 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:43:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [217.19.15.108] (HELO ro.nux.ro) (217.19.15.108) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:43:49 +0000 Received: from webmail.nux.ro (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ro.nux.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25FB19F6A5 for ; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 14:43:27 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=li.nux.ro; s=dkimnux; t=1391697807; bh=IQ5oqftZkGMQUWi/2+nSLah/Tetyf3ow7qzwa/302kE=; h=MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:From:To: Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID; b=Phgx+lvh5uM4ROlOrPC1hobYqoeq5+4DBfx4WdZbAMh4z4CX4l2ZryF0IUC0z/0v9 65vS4V1/zsLaW8LulQA8RdaY08BkOuXsY8Cz19gx7FoXfGwH7ADeeHnrrjRfhPcDW5 5n6YlmbVTzhN67sGds5Z9MeiM1b3okl4BqgMY3xQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2014 14:43:27 +0000 From: Nux! To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Subject: Re: XEN vs. KVM In-Reply-To: <277101cf2339$ab3fd8f0$01bf8ad0$@uplink.ua> References: <277101cf2339$ab3fd8f0$01bf8ad0$@uplink.ua> Message-ID: X-Sender: nux@li.nux.ro User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9-beta X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 06.02.2014 12:48, v.melnik@uplink.ua wrote: > Dear colleagues, > > I'm using CloudStack with KVM for a year and a half, but, as I can > see, some > people would recommend to use XEN instead of KVM, because it's > "better". > > Would anybody be so kind as to explain why XEN is better than KVM? > > Thank you very much in advance! Hello, This has been discussed recently, check this http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.apache.cloudstack.user/9516 HTH Lucian -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro