Mailing-List: contact users-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of nordlicht1984@hotmail.de
 designates 157.55.2.45 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <DUB109-W1950AC7EB0055BD288D357C6EB0@phx.gbl>
From: Lisa B. <nordlicht1984@hotmail.de>
To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: RE: Replacing Virtual Router with a custom virtual appliance
 template
Date: Sun, 1 Dec 2013 21:28:04 +0100
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: <07af01ceee42$b05a6750$110f35f0$@cloudcentral.com.au>
References: <07af01ceee42$b05a6750$110f35f0$@cloudcentral.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

hey michal=2C=0A=
=0A=
i am not sure if this is what you are looking for but i just came across th=
is blog post while tracking down a different problem:=0A=
=0A=
http://blog.remibergsma.com/2012/08/30/going-beyond-cloudstack-advanced-net=
working-how-i-replaced-the-virtual-router-with-my-own-physical-linux-router=
/=0A=
=0A=
good luck!=0A=
lisa=0A=
=0A=
________________________________=0A=
> From: michal.rodzos@cloudcentral.com.au =0A=
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org =0A=
> Subject: Replacing Virtual Router with a custom virtual appliance templat=
e =0A=
> Date: Sun=2C 1 Dec 2013 14:09:02 +1100 =0A=
> =0A=
> =0A=
> Is it possible to create a network offering=2C which would use a custom =
=0A=
> virtual appliance instead of the default Debian template? =0A=
> =0A=
> My understanding is currently only following network providers are =0A=
> supported/available in ACS: =0A=
> =0A=
> - Citrix NetScaler =0A=
> =0A=
> - F5 =0A=
> =0A=
> - Juniper SRX =0A=
> =0A=
> - Virtual Router =0A=
> =0A=
> - Cisco ASA 100v (Citrix CloudPlatform only?) =0A=
> =0A=
> =0A=
> =0A=
> I=92ve found a wiki page =0A=
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Palo+Alto+Firewall=
+Integration& =0A=
> that somebody managed to integrate the Palo Alto Firewall into ACS. =0A=
> Plus some other people managed to get the midokura or Nicira to work ? =
=0A=
> =0A=
> So it seems that custom network providers are feasible=85 =0A=
> =0A=
> I'd like to provide a premium network offering with a commercial =0A=
> security gateway/UTM virtual appliance as a network provider. Ie the =0A=
> FortiGate UTM provides VPN=2C NAT=2C DNS=2C DHCP=2C routing and other net=
work =0A=
> features similar to Virtual Router=2C but also offers security features =
=0A=
> like anitispam=2C virus scanning=2C deep packet inspection=2C IPS etc. So=
 the =0A=
> question is how hard is=2C and how much dev effort is required? =0A=
> =0A=
> Other option is to create a network like this =0A=
> Internet -> ACS VR-> FortiGate TM VM -> customer VMs =0A=
> But not sure how can force all the public traffic from the VMs to go =0A=
> via the FortiGate? =0A=
> =0A=
> The environment is XenServer 6.2 and ACS 4.2.1 with Advanced Networking =
=0A=
> =0A=
> Thanks=2C =0A=
> Michal =0A=
> =0A=
> =0A=
> =0A=
> Regards=2C =0A=
> Michal Rodzos =0A=
> Solutions Architect =0A=
> =0A=
> [CloudCentral - Secure Australian =0A=
> Cloud]<http://www.cloudcentral.com.au/?utm_source=3Dmichal&utm_medium=3De=
mail&utm_campaign=3Dcloudcentral> =0A=
> Phone: 1300 144 007 | Mobile: +61 421 834 204 =0A=
> [View Michal Rodzos' profile on =0A=
> LinkedIn]<http://www.linkedin.com/in/michalrodzos>| Skype: =0A=
> michal.rodzos | Twitter<https://twitter.com/cloudcentral> =0A=
> =0A=
> 		 	   		  =