cloudstack-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Patrick Miller <patrick.mil...@sungard.com>
Subject Re: Multi-master MySQL Setup
Date Tue, 05 Nov 2013 21:50:37 GMT
Take a look at the percona [1] implementation of mysql and there clustered
version.
Round robin reads and writes supported.

1] http://www.percona.com/

 Patrick


On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 9:55 AM, Adrian Lewis <adrian@alsiconsulting.co.uk>wrote:

> Hi Marty/Nux!,
>
> Thanks for the feedback - sounds like multi-master is not a good thing
> then! Load will likely be very small for at least the next 6 months but I
> figured that it was one of those things that could be set easily now
> (still setting up) that I might appreciate later.
>
> Based on both your responses, I think I'll just leave it well alone! Need
> to get to grips with pacemaker/corosync anyway for other reasons so I'll
> just try that with either DRBD replication or MySQL replication.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Adrian
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marty Sweet [mailto:msweet.dev@gmail.com]
> Sent: 05 November 2013 17:23
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Multi-master MySQL Setup
>
> Others may have had more success with this but from experience of MySQL in
> multi-master setups I would avoid this entirely.
>
> A common setup is using DRDB to provide a master/slave:
> Management 1 (MySQL Master) w/ virtual IP Management 2 (MySQL Slave)
>
> HA IP Address (for agents/services requiring DB write) which is assigned
> to the master (using Pacemaker).
>
> You can then send web management client to the HA IP Address as well.
>
> It may be worth considering if you need load balancing, depending on your
> setup - what loads are you experiencing?
>
> Marty
>
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 5:13 PM, Adrian Lewis
> <adrian@alsiconsulting.co.uk>wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> >
> >
> > Just wondering if anyone is using a MySQL multi-master configuration
> > with auto_increment_offset (e.g.10) and auto_increment_increment (1
> > for server 1, 2 for server 2 etc)? Does it work? Does anyone know a
> > reason why it doesn't or wouldn't work? Is there anything from an
> > application point of view that could/would trip up CS if
> > auto_increment values are set as more than 1?
> >
> >
> >
> > Not planning on deploying multimaster just yet but if I at least start
> > with an auto_increment of 10, I'd have the option of adding a second
> > master later and being able to load-balance more effectively.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> >
> >
> >
> > Adrian
> >
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message