Mailing-List: contact users-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of dportiz@outlook.com
 designates 65.54.190.140 as permitted sender)
Message-ID: <BAY168-W1100C1A25F11897CD26E8F9B23B0@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="_a431728f-ec08-4a9d-af79-bcc924c3cb40_"
From: David Ortiz <dportiz@outlook.com>
To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
Subject: RE: Basic Networking - 4.0.2 - Same CIDR for all networks (vmware)
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 13:08:10 -0400
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: 
 <CANjbLiVmORsWfg0YM_5Tj7XwTyUxfi+dr8nHdztf0S9o=O9KYA@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CANjbLiVmORsWfg0YM_5Tj7XwTyUxfi+dr8nHdztf0S9o=O9KYA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0

--_a431728f-ec08-4a9d-af79-bcc924c3cb40_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Stephen=2C
     I have NFS based SS running on a flat network alongside my guests with=
 basic networking with 4.0.1.  I would expect that to still be viable in 4.=
0.2.
Thanks=2C     Dave

> Date: Wed=2C 21 Aug 2013 10:17:15 +0100
> Subject: Basic Networking - 4.0.2 - Same CIDR for all networks (vmware)
> From: stephen.meehan@gmail.com
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>=20
> Hi All=2C
>=20
> I have installed CS 4.0.2 against VMware=2C using basic networking and us=
ed
> the same address space=2C a /23=2C for guest and management.
>=20
> My SSVM fails to mount NFS based SS=2C I have since read on a thread in t=
his
> mailing list that this is because the guest and management networks need =
to
> be on unique CIDRs.
>=20
> Can someone confirm this? Is there anyway to have them live on the same
> space as long as the addresses don't overlap?
>=20
> Regards=2C
> Stephen
 		 	   		  =

--_a431728f-ec08-4a9d-af79-bcc924c3cb40_--