Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C44010CA3 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 19:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 61602 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2013 19:51:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 61253 invoked by uid 500); 9 Sep 2013 19:51:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 61231 invoked by uid 99); 9 Sep 2013 19:51:40 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 19:51:40 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [199.127.140.36] (HELO zimbra01.appcore.com) (199.127.140.36) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 09 Sep 2013 19:51:34 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra01.appcore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA5CE16C25E for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 14:51:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from zimbra01.appcore.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra01.appcore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id gb8KXF1VHZPE for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 14:51:08 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zimbra01.appcore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 474EA1651D8 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 14:51:08 -0500 (CDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at zimbra01.appcore.com Received: from zimbra01.appcore.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zimbra01.appcore.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id xXTVWhk-dD24 for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 14:51:08 -0500 (CDT) Received: from zimbra01.appcore.com (zimbra01.appcore.com [199.127.140.36]) by zimbra01.appcore.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E85D16C25E for ; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 14:51:08 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 14:51:07 -0500 (CDT) From: John Skinner To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Message-ID: <2105766772.292012.1378756267856.JavaMail.zimbra@appcore.com> In-Reply-To: References: <898112010.250367.1378419385461.JavaMail.zimbra@appcore.com> <6375B4D7-0FCC-494A-817F-30F439FBD6DD@citrix.com> <52298641.5080307@gmail.com> <1365855074.255712.1378473820682.JavaMail.zimbra@appcore.com> <758812688.262623.1378492032646.JavaMail.zimbra@appcore.com> <1032743020.285117.1378736923782.JavaMail.zimbra@appcore.com> Subject: Re: VMware DomainRouter MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_292011_1918128327.1378756267855" X-Originating-IP: [69.170.148.179] X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.0.4_GA_5737 (ZimbraWebClient - SAF6 (Mac)/8.0.4_GA_5737) Thread-Topic: VMware DomainRouter Thread-Index: Ac6tiTcrvuUWPu4lR2iHd32ryBS9SUxZfdfL X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org ------=_Part_292011_1918128327.1378756267855 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Awesome. Thank you.=20 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ilya Musayev" =20 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org=20 Sent: Monday, September 9, 2013 1:20:09 PM=20 Subject: RE: VMware DomainRouter=20 Yes only works for vmware and it worked for me in ACS 4.1=20 -----Original Message-----=20 From: John Skinner [mailto:john.skinner@appcore.com]=20 Sent: Monday, September 09, 2013 10:29 AM=20 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org=20 Subject: Re: VMware DomainRouter=20 So to put the management network on a VLAN on VMware would I just specify a= management network label for example if I wanted VLAN 96: "vSwitch0,96" ?= =20 ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Skinner" =20 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org=20 Cc: "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" =20 Sent: Friday, September 6, 2013 1:27:12 PM=20 Subject: Re: VMware DomainRouter=20 Also, is it possible to put the management network on a tagged VLAN? It doe= sn't look like it is through the UI, but could I make some database changes= to get cloud to create the nics on the host with a vlan similar to guest n= etworks?=20 John Skinner=20 Senior Systems Administrator | Appcore - the business of cloud computing=C2= =AE=20 Office +1.800.735.7104=20 Direct +1.515.612.7783 | Mobile +1.515.745.0248 john.skinner@appcore.com | = www.appcore.com=20 ----------------------------------------------------------------------=20 The information in this message is intended for the named recipients only. = It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise pr= otected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient, you are her= eby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or the taking of a= ny action in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly prohibite= d. If you have received this e-mail in error, do not print it or disseminat= e it or its contents. In such event, please notify the sender by return e-m= ail and delete the e-mail file immediately thereafter. Thank you.=20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "John Skinner" =20 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org=20 Cc: "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" =20 Sent: Friday, September 6, 2013 8:23:40 AM=20 Subject: Re: VMware DomainRouter=20 So it's expected that it uses an IP address from the management network on = the domain router? I typically only set aside 10 or so IP addresses from th= e management network for CloudStack usage for things like SSVM and console = proxy. Am I going to have to allocate a lot more of my management IP addres= ses now? Also, I believe I did use the 5.1 SDK. Thanks for the replies guys= !=20 ----- Original Message -----=20 From: "Kirk Kosinski" =20 To: users@cloudstack.apache.org=20 Cc: "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" =20 Sent: Friday, September 6, 2013 2:37:37 AM=20 Subject: Re: VMware DomainRouter=20 Right, since on KVM and XS hosts we can run scripts directly on the host to= communicate with system VMs, whereas on ESXi this is discouraged and not e= ven possible by default.=20 Best regards,=20 Kirk=20 On 09/05/2013 10:07 PM, Jayapal Reddy Uradi wrote:=20 > This is expected in vmware. In Xen and KVM we have link local IP address.= =20 >=20 > Thanks,=20 > Jayapal=20 >=20 > On 06-Sep-2013, at 3:46 AM, John Skinner wrote= :=20 >=20 >> Hello list,=20 >>=20 >> I just setup a CloudStack 4.1 environment with vSphere 5.1. Everything s= eems to be working ok for the most part. However, I have noticed that my do= main routers are getting created with a management IP address for the contr= ol network instead of a control network IP address (the link local IP addre= sses). Is this expected behavior?=20 >>=20 >=20 ------=_Part_292011_1918128327.1378756267855--