Mailing-List: contact users-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com
 designates 66.165.176.89 as permitted sender)
From: Chiradeep Vittal <Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com>
To: "users@cloudstack.apache.org" <users@cloudstack.apache.org>,
	"rwheeler@artifact-software.com" <rwheeler@artifact-software.com>
Subject: Re: CS 4.1 and CentOS 6.3
Thread-Topic: CS 4.1 and CentOS 6.3
Thread-Index: AQHOpM82dIbhgliPF0a7MbbNKzhpR5mszCmAgAATiwCAASgbAA==
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 17:45:32 +0000
Message-ID: <CE4625E4.28E04%chiradeep.vittal@citrix.com>
In-Reply-To: <521F7F64.6040801@artifact-software.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.6.130613
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-ID: <E1B50819343396419FFAE0CA1EAD5536@citrix.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

What *I* would wish (if wishes were horses=8A) would be a process similar t=
o
vagrant.
stackmaker init basic
stackmaker up

Where stackmaker is a yet-to-be-invented-and-written adjunct to CloudStack.

The result of the above commands would be a CloudStack  management server,
and a CloudStack instance running on the same machine as CloudStack
management server.=20

No need to read the docs :)

This would probably involve some combination of marvin config and some
intelligent guesses about the environment.

--
Chiradeep

On 8/29/13 10:05 AM, "Ron Wheeler" <rwheeler@artifact-software.com> wrote:

>I am in the same position and I suspect that others are as well.
>Who would be interested in participating in a virtual meeting to walk
>through the installation together to find out where the instructions are
>wrong?
>
>It seems to be a known problem that if you follow the instructions
>exactly as they are written, you end up with a non-functional system.
>This seems to be partly caused by an installation procedure that is
>supposed to be all things to all people and tries to support too many
>configuration options.
>
>I would like to see if I could get a simple, single cpu up and running
>with CentOS 6.4 (could live with 6.3 but wonder why not the latest), one
>network card sitting in a 192.168.n.x network that can be reached by
>anyone on the same 192.168.n.x network.
>Creating 1 guest Centos 6.4 VM on that machine would at least let me
>know that CloudStack works.
>
>Reaching a port open on the Guest VM from a front-end would be my
>ultimate goal. I just want to have a publicly accessible  Apache HTTP
>server on another server attached to Tomcat running on the guest VM. If
>I can get this working the rest of the universe of CloudStack nirvana
>should be achievable.
>
>Adding additional machines should be possible from that point.
>Adding network cards and storage devices should also be possible.
>
>Anyone interested?
>
>Ron
>
>
>On 29/08/2013 11:55 AM, Marty Sweet wrote:
>> Hi Taylor,
>>
>> No problem, just reply back to the mailing list with your issues and
>>logs
>> (if necessary) and someone will help you out!
>>
>> Marty
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Taylor Schneider
>><tschneider@live.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> I have been trying to get cloudstack installed for several weeks now
>>>but
>>> keep running into issues.I was wondering if someone was available to
>>>talk
>>> about some things and high level and possibly take a look at my
>>>configs /
>>> logs to help troubleshoot?
>>> Thanks
>
>
>--=20
>Ron Wheeler
>President
>Artifact Software Inc
>email: rwheeler@artifact-software.com
>skype: ronaldmwheeler
>phone: 866-970-2435, ext 102
>