Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2D36B1070E for ; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 13:23:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 19271 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2013 13:23:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 19119 invoked by uid 500); 8 Jul 2013 13:23:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 19105 invoked by uid 99); 8 Jul 2013 13:23:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 13:23:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: error (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.128.173] (HELO mail-ve0-f173.google.com) (209.85.128.173) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 13:23:08 +0000 Received: by mail-ve0-f173.google.com with SMTP id jw11so3487072veb.4 for ; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 06:22:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=jzejw9R1aL4Dp9F5/8RETsrjFWFqdiM+TpE6DO0ZQUo=; b=YuwY6wIjemQ5Y78H/PKsCz9hw5KxyierQh+fQ5hLYBDeqlB0EHcXTe7iWQe6n1JCof dSt0s/WekTLi5/1waMCLP/6JoW6UCbeUT7IzOnr+nZHEx2ZZmIwAexjTwC6BL4pqQDOA Sqctt+mqp8e85TZODhhSx0vWzLtu9yQ+L6w3eJVbUSxc/Cf93hPlgHPZ89S2NAriqA9o 0Hy05sc0mPwaB47SeFUIM2qS/GOoo64A+xiR7YasFksYbzDOQXiXe4nX/v9s3nbYRsHZ bzL9NKkmwVI9RT3yxL3ArFM5IY2njhRfpDQDpvj2pYpzTybcm6/cVOsy7WA5onuTWaty h/Yg== X-Received: by 10.220.88.68 with SMTP id z4mr13800974vcl.10.1373289747543; Mon, 08 Jul 2013 06:22:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.155.141 with HTTP; Mon, 8 Jul 2013 06:22:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <77B337AF224FD84CBF8401947098DD8705B719@SJCPEX01CL01.citrite.net> References: <77B337AF224FD84CBF8401947098DD8705B719@SJCPEX01CL01.citrite.net> From: David Nalley Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 09:22:07 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2? To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Cc: "dev@cloudstack.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlJ/KaWEp80eECaOL7f1zoV8SCi6xK2i2owp03uRIkvDhHsXM8fROk4bPPTj7NAcyB7DrCJ X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Edison Su wrote: > Due to object store refactor, Swift is broken. The reason, is that, we only have S3 test environment in our lab, so only S3 is tested for now. > Before adding the feature back, I'd better ask from, the community, do we want to support Swift? If so, which version of Swift? This will take some efforts to support Swift, are there any volunteers can help the integration? Whats the bug ID for this? Unplanned/Unannounced deprecation of a feature is a blocker IMO. It engenders a bad relationship with our users, and strands them on previous versions with no good migration/upgrade path. --David