Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 13CB4C982 for ; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 21:43:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 42269 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2013 21:43:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-users-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 42244 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jul 2013 21:43:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact users-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list users@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 42236 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jul 2013 21:43:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 21:43:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of davestyle@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.45 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.45] (HELO mail-qa0-f45.google.com) (209.85.216.45) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 21:43:48 +0000 Received: by mail-qa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id ci6so5181751qab.11 for ; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 14:43:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=XXIkHS6Y4f3bapmwsSkalSHPWyc567vWbzcd8vw0nxE=; b=HE11tMOmVjoQkksM66oaIYWBJ9//vsL1KqhB7LCS3Jt7mRS8XDPuhVxHSpuhOytTAG gnOGUcQyUQusAGo+QhwXzFKoYVmjKyNko4IT4EFB+UTnUNeOFSCil6PDuPF522N6muck 1X7An2b7DXmMCgZ89un5RokKe+SVHaQV+dA+1lx1FkkYOUDIRE/Zf9UHleL6ZtcL9bi3 14c5Ds9EnDFRen174G0kewiayVfq2pG/oag+Pw4iHF6j44U1Eohmth4OMHNiTmvnevG7 JaGuEhLmDx/Y5qklaw/Tg/OaUN/lQXJBLFSy9luHdKqltslPUdmTuYtjVJwXmzI83ozG vvrA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.229.10.65 with SMTP id o1mr2307818qco.87.1373147008092; Sat, 06 Jul 2013 14:43:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.49.127.100 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Jul 2013 14:43:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 22:43:27 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: vm's disk io performance declines quickly after being created 0.5-1 hours later. From: David Comerford To: users@cloudstack.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1132e5fca44ff604e0deb3fe X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a1132e5fca44ff604e0deb3fe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Doesn't sounds like a CloudStack problem. Spin up a Linux instance and see does it have the same problem. Then apply some science and check I/O inside the instance. Then I/O on the primary storage device. Keep an eye on the storage NICs too. Does you host have enough RAM? Maybe it's booting up in main memory and starting to swap over the hour. Best regards, David Comerford Mobile: +353 87 1238295 Email: davestyle@gmail.com Website: http://dave.ie GPG key: http://pgp.dave.ie On 6 July 2013 10:56, WXR <1485739420@qq.com> wrote: > I create a windows 2003 server enterprise 32bit vm template. > When I use this template to create a vm instance and start the vm.The disk > io performance is normal,it just takes 5 seconds to copy a 200MB file.And > other files/directories copy jobs are very fask. > > But 0.5-1 hours later,the vm need serveral minutes to copy a 200MB > file,and all other files copy job become very slow. > > I don't know if it is an issue of windows 2003 vm template,or cloudstack > configuration,or storage configuration. > Does anyone meet the same issue? --001a1132e5fca44ff604e0deb3fe--