cloudstack-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dean Kamali <dean.kam...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Wrong storage capacity issue reported
Date Wed, 17 Jul 2013 14:13:01 GMT
I think we should file another bug for NFS, I'm having the same issue here,
showing double amount of storage, I have a 2TB lun for primary storage,
however in CS Management console its showing 4TB.

CS 4.1


On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 5:32 AM, Indra Pramana <indra@sg.or.id> wrote:

> Dear Wido and all,
>
> FYI, I managed to resolve the problem by installing latest version of
> libvirt. Apparently, the libvirt version that I was using (1.0.2), which I
> got from here:
>
>
> http://blog.widodh.nl/2013/06/a-quick-note-on-running-cloudstack-with-rbd-on-ubuntu-12-04/
>
> was the culprit. I downloaded the latest libvirt version (version 1.1.0)
> from their FTP site:
>
> ftp://libvirt.org/libvirt/libvirt-1.1.0.tar.gz
>
> Install the latest librbd-dev package:
>
> apt-get install librbd-dev
>
> Then compile libvirt with storage RBD enabled:
>
> ./autogen.sh --prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/bin --sbindir=/usr/sbin
> --with-storage-rbd
>
> Restart the KVM host after it's done.
>
> virsh pool-info is now showing the correct "Allocation" amount:
>
> root@hv-kvm-02:~# virsh pool-info d433809b-01ea-3947-ba0f-48077244e4d6
> Name:           d433809b-01ea-3947-ba0f-48077244e4d6
> UUID:           d433809b-01ea-3947-ba0f-48077244e4d6
> State:          running
> Persistent:     no
> Autostart:      no
> Capacity:       5.47 TiB
> Allocation:     328.00 B
> Available:      5.47 TiB
>
> Tried to create a VM instance, and now the VM can utilise the RBD storage
> pool. No more "insufficient space on pool" error message on the log.
>
> The only issue is that, I noted that only the DATADISK volume is created on
> the RBD primary storage pool. The ROOT volume of that VM is still created
> on the NFS primary storage pool.
>
> Is there a way to ensure that the ROOT volume will also be created on the
> RBD primary storage pool instead of the NFS pool?
>
> Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
>
> Cheers.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:42 PM, Indra Pramana <indra@sg.or.id> wrote:
>
> > Dear Wido and all,
> >
> > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Indra Pramana <indra@sg.or.id> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Prasanna,
> >>
> >> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Prasanna Santhanam <tsp@apache.org
> >wrote:
> >>
> >>> It might be a bug on ceph but the thread you referenced was resolved.
> >>> See here: http://markmail.org/message/mkm2fqyawmwpufsc
> >>>
> >>> If it still persists, can you please file a bug on JIRA?
> >>>
> >>
> >> As suggested, I have filed a bug on JIRA.
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-3542
> >>
> >> Appreciate any advise on how to resolve the problem. Wido, any comments
> >> from your end? :)
> >>
> >
> > Anyone has any clues on how to resolve this problem? It is a show-stopper
> > for me, I can't proceed further without able to get my RBD primary
> storage
> > to work.
> >
> > Any advice is greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Looking forward to your reply, thank you.
> >
> > Cheers.
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message