cloudstack-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Edison Su <Edison...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?
Date Mon, 08 Jul 2013 22:29:56 GMT


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaganti@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 3:23 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org; dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?
> 
> We should support whatever is supported earlier at minimum.

The problem is we don't know what is "whatever is supported", as this feature is not been
tested for years, is anybody knows its status on 4.0, 4.1?

> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edison Su [mailto:Edison.su@citrix.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 3:20 PM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com]
> > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 3:11 PM
> > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; 'Chip Childers'; Sudha Ponnaganti
> > Subject: RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be supported in 4.2?
> >
> > Sudha was Swift working for 4.0 or 4.1?
> >
> > Edison couldn't we use S3 API for Swift? The support is probably not
> > comprehensive [1][2]
> 
> I am not the best person to answer the question, as I have zero knowledge
> about swift.
> Is there anybody really using Swift on CloudStack, or anybody is supporting
> Swift? Please gives us advice on how to support swift better.
> 
> >
> > [1] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Swift/APIFeatureComparison
> > [2] http://docs.openstack.org/trunk/openstack-object-
> > storage/admin/content/configuring-openstack-object-storage-with-
> > s3_api.html
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Sudha Ponnaganti [mailto:sudha.ponnaganti@citrix.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 10:31 AM
> > > To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org; 'Chip Childers'
> > > Subject: RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be
> > > supported in 4.2?
> > >
> > > Swift was tested for older version of Citrix release. There were  no
> > > code changes or certification requests, so that area was deprioritized.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > /Sudha
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Edison Su [mailto:Edison.su@citrix.com]
> > > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 10:15 AM
> > > To: 'Chip Childers'; <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>
> > > Subject: RE: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be
> > > supported in 4.2?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> > > > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2013 6:46 AM
> > > > To: <dev@cloudstack.apache.org>; Edison Su
> > > > Subject: Re: Swift in 4.2 is broken, anybody wants it to be
> > > > supported
> > > in 4.2?
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 9:22 AM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Edison Su <Edison.su@citrix.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > >> Due to object store refactor, Swift is broken. The reason, is
> > > > >> that, we only
> > > > have S3 test environment in our lab, so only S3 is tested for now.
> > > > >> Before adding the feature back, I'd better ask from, the
> > > > >> community, do
> > > > we want to support Swift? If so, which version of Swift? This will
> > > > take some efforts to support Swift, are there any volunteers can
> > > > help
> > > the integration?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Whats the bug ID for this?
> > > > > Unplanned/Unannounced deprecation of a feature is a blocker IMO.
> > > > > It engenders a bad relationship with our users, and strands them
> > > > > on previous versions with no good migration/upgrade path.
> > > > >
> > > > > --David
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Edison, How broken is it?  Is it shorter to fix or revert the
> > > > object store changes?
> > > It's not working at all. Not sure, revert object store will change
> > > it or not, as this feature is not tested by QA for a long time.


Mime
View raw message