cloudstack-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sanjeev Neelarapu <>
Subject RE: Port Forwarding and Source NAT
Date Sat, 15 Jun 2013 04:10:17 GMT
Yes in case of vpc it is by design

Yong Chen <> wrote:

Hi guys,

I found Conserve mode tick box is greyed out if VPC is selected in network offering creation
window. Is this by design to separate inbound port forwarding to a different public IP from
the source NAT one?



-----Original Message-----
From: Len Bellemore []
Sent: Friday, 14 June 2013 1:20 AM
Subject: RE: Port Forwarding and Source NAT

That's it!  thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Sanjeev Neelarapu []
Sent: 13 June 2013 11:55
Subject: RE: Port Forwarding and Source NAT

Hi Len,

While creating network offering we have an option to enable/disable conserver mode.
If conserver mode is on we can use the source NAT ip address for port forwarding.


-----Original Message-----
From: Len Bellemore []
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2013 4:16 PM
Subject: Port Forwarding and Source NAT

Hi Guys,

I have configured an Advanced Zone without Security Groups.

I've set up a network offering with a virtual router with the following services:
UserData, PortForwarding, Vpn, Dhcp, Dns, Firewall, SourceNat, Lb, StaticNat

When I create a network, I get a public IP address with (source NAT) appended to the IP Address
and I am only able to create Firewall rules.  I can't set up port forwarding.

If I want to configure port forwarding so that I can serve web pages from my vms, I need to
allocated more public IP addresses.

Is there a way to set up port forwarding on a source-nat IP address?

Am I going about this the wrong way?


View raw message