Mailing-List: contact users-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of aemneina@gmail.com designates
 74.125.82.178 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Reply-To: aemneina@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAMFG1+M4HJr-waLsDR2kYKLC9Sk3uxFj0QAJzF49DU-5YAjABw@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAMFG1+OnmaAugajM=C5uFMCEG5E8Ab_DkQ-h=Q2fkECDk3UU1Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAO+D_1zUMt40KPYstiUTTuGeu0i6uhB3UYYQBYtC+mFF68anbg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMFG1+M4HJr-waLsDR2kYKLC9Sk3uxFj0QAJzF49DU-5YAjABw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Ahmad Emneina <aemneina@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 12:10:06 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CAO+D_1yG342nSBRBuhqm+wOSCahL4xsGGPAjBddoU-VFYw=5TA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Cluster With two XenServer
To: tawfiq zidi <tawfiq.zidi@gmail.com>
Cc: Cloudstack users mailing list <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d041826da32801e04d8883508

--f46d041826da32801e04d8883508
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hey Tawfq,

It could be a switch configuration issue. Make sure you trunk what you
defined for your zone vlans, to each physical switch port the xen hosts are
connected to. The guests get their private l2 network created by pulling
from a pool you define in the zone vlan range...


On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 12:06 PM, tawfiq zidi <tawfiq.zidi@gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, this deployed with advanced configuration. Even , i checked the setup
> configuration and i found that guest traffic is enabled.
>
> The problem that router DHCP discover available only within the hosts not
> all the cluster , so the other XenServers in the pool can't see anything
> from the router.
>
> So , is there any others configurations have to be done for XenServers
> Pool ?
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Ahmad Emneina <aemneina@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Is this using a basic or advanced zone. This is definitely NOT how it
>> should work :)
>>
>> VM's across a zone, within the same account, should be able to reach each
>> other... when deployed to the same network.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:53 AM, tawfiq zidi <tawfiq.zidi@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I've Created XenServer Cluster with two Host ( XS 6.0.2 ) , the system
>> VMs
>> > ( ssvm and cpvm ) and virtual router are created fine in the first host,
>> > and I've succeded to launch VMs in the first host.
>> >
>> > But when I tried to launch VMs in the second Host, the VMs always
>> remains
>> > unreachable .
>> > I've checked the traffic connection and I found that the VMs in the
>> Second
>> > host can't reach the Virtual router in the First Host , because the VM
>> and
>> > Virtual Router are in seperate Link local network. So that why the VMs
>> in
>> > the Second Host will not get an IP address after a DHCP discover from
>> the
>> > Virtual Router.
>> >
>> > My question is : is it a normal behavior that within a cluster , a VM
>> in a
>> > Host B can't reach a virtual router in a Host A., did I miss some
>> > configuration in creating a pool of XenServer ?
>> >
>> >
>> > Best Regards.
>> >
>>
>
>

--f46d041826da32801e04d8883508--