Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1B7E496FF for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:40:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 71317 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2013 15:40:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 71279 invoked by uid 500); 14 Mar 2013 15:40:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 71250 invoked by uid 99); 14 Mar 2013 15:40:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:40:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kirk.jantzer@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.178 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.178] (HELO mail-ia0-f178.google.com) (209.85.210.178) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 15:40:39 +0000 Received: by mail-ia0-f178.google.com with SMTP id y26so804211iab.37 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 08:40:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=kQgGqPnKK1W/N5x24szSE94OAeNirTQmYlShveA81yk=; b=c4fp2BXtQHiaTZrAWUtEw5Pvmtusls3j5BPIRnBoPoSDNtnTraI+B5mIaYvDX5Akqv s8ZTAnLXjzLl4inBt2lOd86i2tzueV+hJ/ROlf8YcMw15hcogWaUuicSwRVk2KP0XSao HPE6oJF2+EJh2cqfykR0SbLYg3aBRjsH+ILoTuns/pMKVQlI1KPUbrYNFwMng8/KXfzH OlolkdGIbY7lXoc3tT57kvzlxXgIxMkTAPRPpef3WNwisR61+pq/o0K7jKzjitylKSvX ReyDN9qDRHVsrfqeb9gz2BkBdpmjmC0y01OTq55C4wGMgCFW5WmYMLK9uE6zQUBur3kb s1qg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.51.131 with SMTP id k3mr2606742igo.54.1363275618160; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 08:40:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.51.8 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Mar 2013 08:40:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 11:40:18 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What's everyone using for primary storage? From: Kirk Jantzer To: Cloudstack users mailing list Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9340a1df397e604d7e45636 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --14dae9340a1df397e604d7e45636 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks for the reply Matt. What are you seeing as the common platform for these shared storage setups? On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Mathias Mullins < mathias.mullins@citrix.com> wrote: > Hey Kirk, > > Majority of our customers are using shared storage. It's actually a very > low percentage that are using Local storage because it basically negates > all high Availability and eliminates a lot of the useful features in > CloudStack. > > Local storage is usually what I refer to as "Use it and Forget it" because > if you lose the system you can forget getting the VM back. part of the > risk, but the cheaper cost is the obvious reward. most of the local storage > environments I have seen are small cluster, small workload environments > that can afford to back those environments up regularly. > > The large scale 1,000's of VMs you are about 97% likely IMO going to see > shared storage. > > Thank you, > Matt > > On Mar 14, 2013, at 11:28 AM, "Kirk Jantzer" > wrote: > > For my testing, because of available resources, I chose local storage. > However, shared storage (like GlusterFS or the like) is appealing. What are > you using? Why did you chose what you're using? How many instances are you > running? etc. > Thanks!! > -- Regards, Kirk Jantzer c: (678) 561-5475 --14dae9340a1df397e604d7e45636--