Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8;
 format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:55:20 +0000
From: Nux! <nux@li.nux.ro>
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: glusterfs as secondary storage
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAKprHVbi024+N=Y7PcNRDQE8oyaKvwyjHcXUFXFJ742-VmfLjg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <a483c43f3155ecdbc01ce5cbb3b671f9@li.nux.ro>
 <CAKprHVbi024+N=Y7PcNRDQE8oyaKvwyjHcXUFXFJ742-VmfLjg@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <cfc15e820b707b87abe951e53a72eaba@li.nux.ro>
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.9-beta

On 13.02.2013 13:18, David Nalley wrote:
> 
> You could use the Swift support in Gluster and use the Swift Secondary
> Storage support in CloudStack.
> 
> --David

That would complicate my setup even more, it would mean to install 
openstack or the swift frontend for gluster,though I'll note it down, 
cheers.

Regarding my "hacks", which one would you say is "best", or least bad? 
I'm thinking that both ways will be inpractical for the secondary 
storage VM, no? As I would have to do the same tricks there, too.

Lucian

-- 
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!

Nux!
www.nux.ro