cloudstack-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Tamas Monos <tam...@veber.co.uk>
Subject RE: CS 4 Production quality?
Date Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:09:43 GMT
Hi,

I am personally still using 3.0.2 because we have our public services up for around a year
now and the previous 4.0.0 upgrade path was broken due to template and usage problems especially
on Vmware.

The usage issue meant to be fixed in 4.0.1 (which just got released) and the template problem
will not affect you if you start with 4.0.1 from scratch.
Put up a test environment with 4.0.1 see if you are happy with it, check usage by yourself
and if you are happy go live.
Keep that test environment for further upgrade tests as upgrades can always be problematic
even if the product is stable.

Regards

Tamas Monos                                               DDI         +44(0)2034687012
Chief Technical                                             Office    +44(0)2034687000
Veber: The Hosting Specialists               Fax         +44(0)871 522 7057
http://www.veber.co.uk

Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/veberhost
Follow us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/veberhost


-----Original Message-----
From: Nik Martin [mailto:nik.martin@openfra.me] 
Sent: 13 February 2013 15:58
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: CS 4 Production quality?

Would Cloudstack 4 be considered usable in a production environment? I looking to build a
new cloud using CEPH as Primary Storage, so I'm wondering if starting with 4 in the next 4
weeks is advisable yet.

This will be a public cloud, so downtime won't be tolerated very well.

Nik Martin
Mime
View raw message