cloudstack-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ahmad Emneina <aemne...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: CS 4 Production quality?
Date Wed, 13 Feb 2013 20:23:32 GMT
+1. test your use case diligently, then push to prod.


On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 9:09 AM, Tamas Monos <tamasm@veber.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am personally still using 3.0.2 because we have our public services up
> for around a year now and the previous 4.0.0 upgrade path was broken due to
> template and usage problems especially on Vmware.
>
> The usage issue meant to be fixed in 4.0.1 (which just got released) and
> the template problem will not affect you if you start with 4.0.1 from
> scratch.
> Put up a test environment with 4.0.1 see if you are happy with it, check
> usage by yourself and if you are happy go live.
> Keep that test environment for further upgrade tests as upgrades can
> always be problematic even if the product is stable.
>
> Regards
>
> Tamas Monos                                               DDI
> +44(0)2034687012
> Chief Technical                                             Office
> +44(0)2034687000
> Veber: The Hosting Specialists               Fax         +44(0)871 522
> 7057
> http://www.veber.co.uk
>
> Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/veberhost
> Follow us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/veberhost
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nik Martin [mailto:nik.martin@openfra.me]
> Sent: 13 February 2013 15:58
> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: CS 4 Production quality?
>
> Would Cloudstack 4 be considered usable in a production environment? I
> looking to build a new cloud using CEPH as Primary Storage, so I'm
> wondering if starting with 4 in the next 4 weeks is advisable yet.
>
> This will be a public cloud, so downtime won't be tolerated very well.
>
> Nik Martin
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message