Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6B356CC0E for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 09:12:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31842 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2013 09:12:20 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 31753 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jan 2013 09:12:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 31739 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jan 2013 09:12:19 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 09:12:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.180] (HELO mail-wi0-f180.google.com) (209.85.212.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 09:12:12 +0000 Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id hj13so489293wib.13 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 01:11:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:mime-version:x-mailer:thread-index:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=Dp1qx3+VxL5Eka+9Bvu+2Im6VjWYu5FLQ2xlbfFsEcE=; b=icKymy7ptY5Lt2sN1HfyERyR5sv7Zl4jCZxR9afkufxaMmDlEnG+CXsybIEa/v1GnR QIedVaVhItBqmrZS9q4Amvj4a527HYmlHvEJfWZ5s/Wiim2GzGwLT+k9mdI+NLZkyDUS 0w8Ulxd2Wf5Uu+p4MN4RVXugSt0plHi8uvfy8nkqYRcas4B++tP4NT0FO4kygqsy1TjV 7TOgLVy14DNbpZYKgrJYbjZCRakW3Q+O5zu0C/LFf074d/uqv+VHpgaTF/C7lKIcRayX NHxnAyo++kWpNC/JfeVdZ3QU9rev9Qf47yEVO4/zIkWTcK9FmiLhA/1EJyNXjRoY+aKr Qi6A== X-Received: by 10.180.92.36 with SMTP id cj4mr985272wib.23.1358932311808; Wed, 23 Jan 2013 01:11:51 -0800 (PST) From: Fabrice Brazier MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac35SHW9KwFg6W+/SNWkZtoKjjgrNw== Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2013 10:11:51 +0100 Message-ID: <88909cb248a7c6815cd66e1db9baab6b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Several NICs in the same VLAN with the same DHCP Server To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0438934fb81cab04d3f115e9 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnS9HNLHm0rtvht7AtKNcIbiWEoLuABJNh8I/4hjxuf94YLDk00X6zkZrd0zmisjaDfxwwS X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d0438934fb81cab04d3f115e9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Folks, Is it possible to create a VM with two NICs in the same VLANs using the same DHCP Server and ip range (virtual router with DHCP and DNS services enabled) ? This configuration is for a firewall VM and it=92s mandatory to have the sa= me VLAN on several NICS with the same DHCP server. Thanks for your help, Fabrice --=20 Fabrice Brazier *Apalia*=99* *FR: +33-632-73-53-00 *http://www.apalia.net fabrice.brazier@apalia.net* --f46d0438934fb81cab04d3f115e9--