cloudstack-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Abhinandan Prateek <Abhinandan.Prat...@citrix.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules
Date Fri, 04 Jan 2013 10:29:16 GMT
Guarantee is already available in terms of (storage/host/ha) tags.
This is more of best effort. But these best effort parameters need to be
spelt out to make it meaningful.

-abhi


On 04/01/13 3:30 PM, "Mice Xia" <mice_xia@tcloudcomputing.com> wrote:

>Ewww. Sorry, Reply to the wrong loop previously...
>
>I'm also wondering if this is a guarantee or best-effort allocation (like
>user- dispersing planner), if this is a guarantee case, should CS auto
>migrate around VMs to ensure the newly created VM to be allocated on the
>expected host which does not have sufficient capacity?
>
>-Mice
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Mice Xia [mailto:mice_xia@tcloudcomputing.com]
>Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 5:43 PM
>To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules
>
>iirc, Local Storage support was already per zone in 4.0, there is a
>checkbox for enabling local storage when adding a new zone.
>Guest domain prefix can also be specified in zone creation wizard.
>And VR network throttling, is this specified in network offering?
>
>-Mice
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Manan Shah [mailto:manan.shah@citrix.com]
>Sent: Friday, January 04, 2013 8:24 AM
>To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: [DISCUSS] Affinity / Anti-affinity Rules
>
>Hi,
>
>I would like to propose a new feature for enabling Affinity
>/Anti-affinity rules in CS 4.1. I have created a JIRA ticket and provided
>the requirements at the following location.  Please provide feedback on
>the requirements.
>
>JIRA Ticket: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-739
>Requirements: 
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Affinity+-+Anti-aff
>i
>nity+rules
>
>
>Regards,
>Manan Shah
>
>


Mime
View raw message