cloudstack-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Kristoffer Sheather - Cloud Central" <kristoffer.sheat...@cloudcentral.com.au>
Subject re: Is it possible to use Juniper SRX for Firewall functions in conjunction with Virtual Router for Load Balancing functions
Date Mon, 21 Jan 2013 06:19:10 GMT
Anyone with ideas on this?

Regards,
Kristoffer Sheather

----------------------------------------
 From: "Kristoffer Sheather - Cloud Central" 
<kristoffer.sheather@cloudcentral.com.au>
Sent: Sunday, January 20, 2013 3:24 PM
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Is it possible to use Juniper SRX for Firewall functions in 
conjunction with Virtual Router for Load Balancing functions

CloudStack Users,

We are currently designing a new solution with specific security 
requirements and are considering implementing a Juniper SRX series 
firewall.  In order to protect the load balancer from public traffic we 
intend on deploying an 'in-line' topology where the SRX sits in front of 
the load balancer (physical or virtual).

Is it possible (and preferably tested) to use SRX for 
firewall/port-forwarding/VPN and use the CloudStack Virtual Router for load 

balancing?  I know the documentation states that you must use SRX with F5 
for 'in-line' mode, however I can't see why you couldn't use the virtual 
router instead of a F5.

If anyone has experience and can advise that would be greatly appreciated.

Regards,

Kristoffer Sheather
Cloud Central
Scale Your Data Center In The Cloud 
Phone: 1300 144 007 | Mobile: +61 414 573 130 | Email: 
kris@cloudcentral.com.au
LinkedIn:   | Skype: kristoffer.sheather | Twitter: 
http://twitter.com/kristofferjon     


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message