Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of Prasanna.Santhanam@citrix.com
 designates 203.166.19.134 as permitted sender)
Date: Tue, 18 Dec 2012 15:11:35 -0800
From: Prasanna Santhanam <prasanna.santhanam@citrix.com>
To: "cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org"
	<cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org>, CloudStack Users
	<cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: Request for cloudstack-qa mailing list and QA Scrum call
Message-ID: <20121218231135.GB98583@cloud.citrite.net>
Mail-Followup-To: "cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org"
 <cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org>,
	CloudStack Users <cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org>
References: 
 <7914B38A4445B34AA16EB9F1352942F1012F142CFA92@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net>
 <20121218230857.GA98583@cloud.citrite.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20121218230857.GA98583@cloud.citrite.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:38:57AM +0530, Prasanna Santhanam wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 04:32:02AM +0530, Sudha Ponnaganti wrote:
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > Reaching out to community to see if we can have a dedicated QA
> > mailing list mainly to have a focused attention around QA
> > Activities.
> > 
> > 
> > -          To discuss automation acceleration. We already have
> > sizable scripts and need to get those running  in to apache env
> > 
> > -          Discuss QA strategy and have community participate little
> > bit more - Dev community is very active but QA is not at the same
> > level.  There are too many discussions in dev mailing list already.
> > Afraid that QA may not get enough attention
> > 
> > -          Discuss project QA activities and track progress and
> > present relevant info to community. Intention is not to take away
> > visibility but to have a focused vision on QA.
> > 
> > -          Discuss other QA initiatives and have owners drive these
> > initiatives - mainly around automation frameworks, tools
> > implementation for QA
> > 
> > 
> > Please do express your opinion on this.
> > 
> > Also I am going to setup a call to discuss ASF CS 4.1 release QA
> > activities starting next week as we are getting close to the
> > release.
> > 
> 
> Why not use the -users list? It's not high-traffic and QA are users
> testing/using the product? It will encourage our users to test
> alongside releases and participate in the testing process. Some of our
> users I'm sure can contribute automated tests.
> 
Including the users (+cross-posting)


-- 
Prasanna.,