Return-Path: 
 <cloudstack-users-return-2377-apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive=incubator.apache.org@incubator.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 409B1E962
	for <apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org>;
 Thu, 22 Nov 2012 00:13:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 55724 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2012 00:13:38 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 55699 invoked by uid 500); 22 Nov 2012 00:13:38 -0000
Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:cloudstack-users-help@incubator.apache.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:cloudstack-users-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org>
List-Id: <cloudstack-users.incubator.apache.org>
Reply-To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Received: (qmail 55691 invoked by uid 99); 22 Nov 2012 00:13:38 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 00:13:38 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0
	tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from [209.85.216.54] (HELO mail-qa0-f54.google.com) (209.85.216.54)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 22 Nov 2012 00:13:32 +0000
Received: by mail-qa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id g24so565216qab.6
        for <cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org>;
 Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:13:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=google.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type:x-gm-message-state;
        bh=XIvqCmAc8AQ6AaizqK300AmKquCFpx4QbDfVTwlk03c=;
        b=PqqbeUtwbnzmW0a4cItGs7+y6pcBy2ePiqHJWV0PORiJSJJCkyfvk3RHha4aTXoVp+
         J1jFmFkSe+8sCWJ0Va63KHt7XWyE9HPD54d6JLX3psa6zQfDWvgr73IZozn7r6Jl2U+j
         oOelNp2Oa+4wrFIOG5m/+0ZJ8sdh1uAVgZ2/93R26h+Nss+kOL5iC84DSwtlWDgmyPOR
         91yji4o6kXs4SzFjuXFj0DEARGviMuVJlrr2qKMmo1zVmsjV4W9uiyhCUfpIhMGz19AN
         yxenh3GglGrBmFkNoiVshvHyHhK4A0OqtT4Zk6Hc+4ZKgQ14Z66uCnR34Vq0rrpNWgSh
         plvw==
Received: by 10.224.174.138 with SMTP id t10mr20086860qaz.39.1353543191024;
 Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:13:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.49.97.200 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Nov 2012 16:12:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CCD2A87D.37C8B%chiradeep.vittal@citrix.com>
References: <F95EC5DFF06AE04FA54C508ED869D0D2A37846@agcex01.CORP.ISWEST.NET>
 <CCD2A87D.37C8B%chiradeep.vittal@citrix.com>
From: David Nalley <david@gnsa.us>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2012 19:12:49 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CAKprHVbnkAzdR=aqzUzYP0Rrg+xSp4aECK=EsfgTm_d29p+Qmw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Multiple IP's to one instance
To: "cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org"
 <cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Gm-Message-State: 
 ALoCoQl2NQ0Ke9ggtgRObT/Q200bSOB7RmJ6Be8MWpI6DdxPwm7xSytzkvg/6RO3QxqVBPrY+AOr
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

>  - it is expected that there is a 'primary ip' assigned by DHCP and the
> additional ips are assigned manually by the VM owner. However additional
> ips are requested through CS API/UI.

I am conflicted on this - I know the limitations with adding
additional interfaces. I'd almost argue for requiring number of
interfaces/IPs to be set at machine instantiation and still handing
out addresses to all interfaces via DHCP, but not all OSes will handle
that cleanly.