Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 343E6EBCC for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:51:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 10694 invoked by uid 500); 27 Nov 2012 16:51:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 10173 invoked by uid 500); 27 Nov 2012 16:50:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 10151 invoked by uid 99); 27 Nov 2012 16:50:59 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:50:59 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.175] (HELO mail-ob0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 16:50:53 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f175.google.com with SMTP id vb8so10765410obc.6 for ; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:50:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=lPEq2e92F8Rl7DOn9ye/t//b+JGUwfhVbaVWdfcC2CI=; b=mugvfHnjPDP8+dRjB0TbVZFjHYfUbSusAiup+oK1DLDjXYkCqoi5LHgLy3ZwfmFlVz V39K9uszpy5f9iNqE45E56MC+33w7ECrIzvx91fk+knbce/S67CpiMwFzr5lvWxilX2T p8pvTq3gpBUOc0AkzXz11nXNHuet1oPZJX/ic16RdtgShckXiLEe4s51ygi5TsFie+IX OTfFbCMnQL9Lj9w/7omP65kKu3FgtcPuuXuD6vlk8ZjY9FmQXh9EAmONe9DjX9eIp7W2 OMpjP0eQqvVRkphfgSesnmZDY+zM9OUoDuC/xsHW8i8vqf+bj/ZMIfj4jnNyTUm3bTrW YJ/A== Received: by 10.60.170.114 with SMTP id al18mr13818632oec.56.1354035031676; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:50:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.76.84.202 with HTTP; Tue, 27 Nov 2012 08:50:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <2018874769.7125416.1354034414097.JavaMail.root@inria.fr> References: <1705008077.7111993.1354033846835.JavaMail.root@inria.fr> <2018874769.7125416.1354034414097.JavaMail.root@inria.fr> From: David Nalley Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2012 11:50:11 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Cloudstack + kvm : set arch = i686 To: "cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmxZc5BBujDTH/exbu1YOlzNJ+Ompdv9SQkEMOVeP2MRrl4fZ1kfmn262f3cOz3bBEGpclt X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Julien Garet wrot= e: > Hello, > > > We have discovered something today we didn't expect... We are using CS 3.= 0.2 with KVM hypervisors. Our users want to be able to use 32 or 64 bits VM= s, so, we have set up templates using 32 or 64 bits OSes (setting OS type 3= 2 or 64 bits accordingly), but that does not have any impact on the VM depl= oyed... arch option in the domain xml file is x86_64, whatever we choose as= OS Type. > > > Is there a way to deploy 32bits VMs on 64bits hypervisors ? > > The arch of the operating system is different than the arch of the virtualized CPU (which is what I think you are referring to). What benefit do you expect to extract from having a virtualized 32bit CPU compared to a virtualized 64bit cpu? Do users that have physical machines in your environment note that you deployed a 32bit OS on a 64bit CPU? --David