Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of Alex.Huang@citrix.com
 designates 66.165.176.89 as permitted sender)
From: Alex Huang <Alex.Huang@citrix.com>
To: "cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org"
	<cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 09:56:55 -0800
Subject: RE: DNS Issue
Thread-Topic: DNS Issue
Thread-Index: Ac28PkSRn+3B10etSRemXKJ17V0H1wAEBkuAAAEapzAAL5jsoA==
Message-ID: 
 <B1DF26ECC0458748AC97CECE2DA98D41012FA1E1BFD9@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net>
References: <1306574C2C230346999B3DF72D30EE0E1AF058@uk-yo-eml01.cpp-group.com>
 <CCBE9596.35EA6%chiradeep.vittal@citrix.com>
 <1306574C2C230346999B3DF72D30EE0E1AF144@uk-yo-eml01.cpp-group.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <1306574C2C230346999B3DF72D30EE0E1AF144@uk-yo-eml01.cpp-group.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

James,

Currently it does not work that way.  A DHCP server is deployed per network=
.

--Alex

-----Original Message-----
From: James Jeffrey [mailto:James.Jeffrey@cpp.co.uk]=20
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2012 11:14 AM
To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: DNS Issue

For the guest IP. Infrastructure in this environment is open to debate...

What I was hoping was that any one virtual router would just resolve any al=
located IP for any network, but it doesn't seem to work that way.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com]
Sent: 06 November 2012 18:42
To: CloudStack Users
Subject: Re: DNS Issue

Resolve DNS for the public IP or the guest IP?
It really depends on your DNS infrastructure. Because of the dependency on =
the datacenter DNS infrastructure, CloudStack has shied away from an out-of=
-the-box solution.
That's not to deny that it is a real problem. It should be solved, but ther=
e are several approaches, each of which is optimal for certain styles of DN=
S infrastructure.


On 11/6/12 8:48 AM, "James Jeffrey" <James.Jeffrey@cpp.co.uk> wrote:

>Hello,
>
>First a question whether the forums at the old Cloudstack.org website=20
>could be resurrected? They contained a lot of useful information!
>
>Secondly - each of my virtual routers can now seem to only resolve the=20
>DNS entries for the hosts it acts as a DHCP server - I want them to be=20
>able to resolve DNS for all VMs in the system.
>
>Network.dns.basiczone.updates is set to all, but these are advanced=20
>zones anyway.
>
>How do I do this please?
>
>Thanks,
>
>James
>--
>James Jeffrey
>Enterprise Server Administrator
>CPP Group plc
>Holgate Park
>York
>YO26 4GA
>
>Tel: 01904 544 272
>Mob: 07952 284 504
>
>Web: www.cpp.co.uk<http://www.cpp.co.uk/>
>Corporate: www.cppgroupplc.com<http://www.cppgroupplc.com/>
>
>This is an email from CPPGroup Plc, a company registered in England and=20
>Wales.
>Registered number: 07151159. Registered office: Holgate Park, York,
>YO26 4GA.
>This message may contain information that is confidential. If you are=20
>not the intended recipient, you may not peruse, use, disseminate,=20
>distribute or copy this message. If you have received this message in=20
>error, please notify the sender immediately by email, facsimile or=20
>telephone and either return or destroy the original message.
>
>CPPGroup Plc accepts no responsibility for any changes made to this=20
>message after it has been sent by the original author. This email has=20
>been scanned for all viruses by the Webroot Email Security System.