Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 74CE0D62A for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:53:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 79846 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2012 23:53:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 79820 invoked by uid 500); 12 Oct 2012 23:53:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 79806 invoked by uid 99); 12 Oct 2012 23:53:34 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:53:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of outbackdingo@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.175] (HELO mail-ie0-f175.google.com) (209.85.223.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 23:53:28 +0000 Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id c13so5648938ieb.6 for ; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 16:53:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=zD1buc/B0lcTaEUzVHJUDb4LZTkntvBBHr6FTCRXAy4=; b=VRlnlltFnMPfdfqk1a+jPYKcL5qC3wVENbhhEtQ4h56jkz0GVGbK/iGZbBw1rJEsX9 AzCCrb/sk8kQ2DPMvAd3rhe1/yeimy1vCVRb+rTsQSsNdBdPNLEo7+DmrgaRc2y43uAp s//xtGf8ubWqJDdIzzFvyaL+/DLGXLdSx46uQeYgqinZjCYcPkLFu0KxKQiYNaTb+Wse 1tNAkwMlFZ0R1PAtFBZ2Ea2c2Om+ljlKDYumyWUDH4t3VFtDy4wQSpQVSbBbZujOdRRb eDDwNuulOBU53zLBCt/NvG66VvkrvWSvYsoTn1TK9AFa6m6mKENVZPJCgvqHryFqCsAg JkCg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.196.231 with SMTP id ip7mr3688402igc.7.1350085987430; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 16:53:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.72.135 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Oct 2012 16:53:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2012 19:53:07 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What Gartner can't - or won't - tell you about OpenStack Cloud From: Outback Dingo To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: "cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:36 PM, Clement Chen wro= te: > A little bit background: > > Gartner published a research report - "Don't Let OpenStack Hype Distort Y= our Selection of a Cloud Management Platform in 2012 " on OpenStack in mi= d-September, which makes the OpenStack community very unhappy. > > Mirantis, a OpenStack company, wrote a blog (http://www.mirantis.com/blog= /gartner-cannot-tell-about-openstack-cloud/) to response to the Gartner's r= eport. > > There is a lot of FUD and complete untruths about CloudStack in the blog.= I'd encourage everyone to read it and comment. > > Thanks. > > -Clement > > Seems their "censoring comments" Ive replied and its not showing.