Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D472DB28 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 07:38:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22946 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2012 07:38:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22800 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2012 07:38:51 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 22766 invoked by uid 99); 4 Sep 2012 07:38:49 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 07:38:49 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of Sumita.Gorla@citrix.com designates 66.165.176.89 as permitted sender) Received: from [66.165.176.89] (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM) (66.165.176.89) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 07:38:44 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,365,1344211200"; d="scan'208";a="36658442" Received: from ftlpmailmx01.citrite.net ([10.13.107.65]) by FTLPIPO01.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 04 Sep 2012 07:38:23 +0000 Received: from FTLPMAILBOX01.citrite.net ([10.13.98.208]) by FTLPMAILMX01.citrite.net ([10.13.107.65]) with mapi; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 03:38:23 -0400 From: Sumita Gorla To: "cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org" CC: Jacob Ben-David , Anantha Kasetty , Oded Nahum , Cheol Soo Park , Takashi Sugano Date: Tue, 4 Sep 2012 03:38:19 -0400 Subject: Re: multiple NICs on same network Thread-Topic: multiple NICs on same network Thread-Index: Ac2KcEODVV7jjgrLRYuVnGCYOUIq7w== Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20120904065655.GG4575@cloud.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.2.120421 acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thanks. On 9/4/12 12:26 PM, "Prasanna Santhanam" wrote: >On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:36:59PM -0400, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: >> On 8/29/12 3:13 AM, "Sumita Gorla" wrote: >>=20 >> >Can we use Cloudstack APIs to create a VM with two NICs on the same >> >shared network >> >Or isolated network? >> > >>=20 >>=20 >> No, one nic per user vm network. > >The API can be used to create a VM with multiple nics in the same >network. The logic to prevent this in the UI only. You just have to >specify the same NetworkId as a comma-seperated list. so the following >works atm: > >deployVirtualMachine > &templateId=3Dttt > &serviceOfferingId=3Dsss > &networkId=3Dnn,nn > > >Most likely the default gateway gets clobbered and only one NIC is in >use at all times. The other being passive. > >Just Curious, What would be a use-case for such a requirement though? > >Thanks, > > >--=20 >Prasanna.,