Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EF349DB69 for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 19:19:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 40046 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2012 19:19:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 40014 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2012 19:19:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 40006 invoked by uid 99); 4 Sep 2012 19:19:29 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 19:19:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fguerrero@ipaddress.com.ar designates 200.80.170.227 as permitted sender) Received: from [200.80.170.227] (HELO exch1.ipaddress.com.ar) (200.80.170.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 19:19:24 +0000 Received: from [192.168.2.139] ([190.247.112.43] RDNS failed) by exch1.ipaddress.com.ar over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 4 Sep 2012 16:19:00 -0300 Message-ID: <5046541F.3070309@ipaddress.com.ar> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 16:18:55 -0300 From: Facundo Guerrero User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: multiple NICs on same network References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Sep 2012 19:19:00.0468 (UTC) FILETIME=[235D1340:01CD8AD2] X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-8.0.0.1259-6.500.1024-19160.007 X-TM-AS-Result: No--15.040900-0.000000-31 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No Thanks . I had a server with 10 ipaddress i modify the router script to make the nat to that IPs. I would be a great feature to have the possibility to add "floating Ip's" in the private network and nat 1:1 to a public IP. El 04/09/12 15:59, Alena Prokharchyk escribi�: > No, it's not possible. Although seems like you can assign 2 nics from the > same network to the vm, the things start breaking when we create network > rules (firewall/pf/lb) for vm in the network. As we always assume that vm > can't have more than one nic in the network. > > -Alena. > > On 9/4/12 11:50 AM, "Facundo Guerrero" wrote: > >> It's possible to NAT 1:1 a public IP for each of this Privates IP's? To >> do that at this moment i modify the script in the VP. >> >> >> Thanks >> >> El 04/09/12 03:56, Prasanna Santhanam escribi�: >>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:36:59PM -0400, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: >>>> On 8/29/12 3:13 AM, "Sumita Gorla" wrote: >>>> >>>>> Can we use Cloudstack APIs to create a VM with two NICs on the same >>>>> shared network >>>>> Or isolated network? >>>>> >>>> No, one nic per user vm network. >>> The API can be used to create a VM with multiple nics in the same >>> network. The logic to prevent this in the UI only. You just have to >>> specify the same NetworkId as a comma-seperated list. so the following >>> works atm: >>> >>> deployVirtualMachine >>> &templateId=ttt >>> &serviceOfferingId=sss >>> &networkId=nn,nn >>> >>> >>> Most likely the default gateway gets clobbered and only one NIC is in >>> use at all times. The other being passive. >>> >>> Just Curious, What would be a use-case for such a requirement though? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> >> >