Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B5F0FD441 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:54:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 30251 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2012 17:54:19 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 30226 invoked by uid 500); 22 Aug 2012 17:54:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 30218 invoked by uid 99); 22 Aug 2012 17:54:19 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:54:19 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.149.155] (HELO na3sys009aog126.obsmtp.com) (74.125.149.155) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:54:13 +0000 Received: from mail-vb0-f47.google.com ([209.85.212.47]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob126.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUDUcsIWPSaP/9bPAH8zNGg2YMXwGE2xB@postini.com; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 10:53:53 PDT Received: by vbbfr13 with SMTP id fr13so1320978vbb.6 for ; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 10:53:51 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=Tv4BWhYMiTlkCwu0CsJcVHIhR3Q0xH1965Xz36fth9U=; b=YOk2ULYg33aOob4NgLCxzNJKBLvIrO1RL0nzh8yN+D4wIgKnXgPbYVeXm8Gumrdbq7 q8rVgH/GunO7JX7VMnjXJNTeaRAeTGNy4FvGAVohRyA78yw12QKu06KdMQ/CcZH32XkQ H0U5gTRd5aSwv1+/7fPeXIR2C/m+9xYQYAvh+w3Qt2Yw5KZGGWKox9a1lhqAJ6sy2NH7 w2dWmBgrmIaz3bp1xreZy/To31WmohvQWv2+d2gSwvpyjdTyhc/W+b5VwgmNBHxUXaff mbFkQQjR1R4LW9Dw0sejt3bGgXBPwLurKpcV1juglLqVIwRDhIcLjlPU3EptbNUG7DNI ym7g== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.58.114.20 with SMTP id jc20mr19081327veb.15.1345658031634; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 10:53:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.9.207 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2012 10:53:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <7914B38A4445B34AA16EB9F1352942F1012F0E538A78@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> References: <7914B38A4445B34AA16EB9F1352942F1012F0E5389DF@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <61AE1E2837A06D4A8E98B796183842D40129303CBBDB@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <7914B38A4445B34AA16EB9F1352942F1012F0E538A78@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 13:53:51 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Navigation concept From: Chip Childers To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Cc: "cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk/xhCJKahmkY678ioQLvjJX8Bl50OOGtTkFmUP5G2dOwMovbjT0w3N/RI1Rv4GnpPbRGna X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Please do keep proposing ideas though Sonny! Obviously design is always iterative, and feedback's how to get to the best result... (I'm sure I'm preaching to the choir here, but I wanted to say thanks anyway) On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Sonny Chhen wrote: > Thanks for the feedback Chip. It seems that the sliding navigation may be the better route in this case. We may have the same slide down effect in another iteration of the notification as most people seem to miss the counter. > > Thanks You and Best Regards, > > Sonny H. Chhen > Manager of User Interface & User Experience | Citrix Systems - CloudPlatform > 4988 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 10:46 AM > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Navigation concept > > Sonny, > > The 3-D effect is actually kind of jarring. Using that daily would probably cause some frustration. > > Personally, I'm a fan of minimal animation... and when it does exist, for it to be fast and visually meaningful. > > -chip > > On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Will Chan wrote: >> I personally would like it if the navigation would just slide out. The 3d stuff although is "cool", doesn't seem to add anything useful in terms of UX. In fact, I would argue it makes it slightly less useful because the text become blurry. >> >> Also, I assume this required HTML5 and building something like this prevents users of older browsers the ability to use this unless you plan on having supporting multiple navigation models. >> >> Will >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Sonny Chhen [mailto:Sonny.Chhen@citrix.com] >>> Sent: Wednesday, August 22, 2012 9:44 AM >>> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org; cloudstack- >>> dev@incubator.apache.org >>> Subject: UI: Navigation concept >>> >>> Hello All, >>> >>> In an effort to gain more screen real estate, a few front-end >>> developers and I have been playing around with changing the >>> navigation and are researching a few things like max and min width in >>> the css. Below is a link to a sample of a "3d cubed" based >>> navigation. Would love to hear thoughts regarding this idea. We are >>> still working on some of the more requested items in the feedback(too >>> many clicks, easier accessibility, etc...) but are taking things step by step. >>> >>> http://www.schhen.com/citrix/demos/demo5/ >>> >>> Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns. >>> >>> Thanks You and Best Regards, >>> >>> Sonny H. Chhen >>> Manager of User Interface & User Experience | Citrix Systems - >>> CloudPlatform >>> 4988 Great America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA 95054, USA >> >> >