Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: unknown
 amxa:i11-www2.idea11.com.auinclude:_spf.getharvest.com?all (nike.apache.org:
 encountered unrecognized mechanism during SPF processing of domain of
 jkahn@idea11.com.au)
From: James Kahn <jkahn@idea11.com.au>
To: "cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org"
	<cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: Re: [leap second] Anyone else experiencing high rates of linux
 server crashes today? - Server Fault
Thread-Topic: [leap second] Anyone else experiencing high rates of linux
 server crashes today? - Server Fault
Thread-Index: Ac1XClec7JutEvQwRoKLOin5fHIScwAvHyoA///xooD//pnyQP/9KPCwgAasDYA=
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2012 22:37:43 +0000
Message-ID: <CC185E8B.1E8F6%jkahn@idea11.com.au>
In-Reply-To: <5E3DCAE61C95FA4397679425D7275D267352248FA5@HQ-MX03.us.teo.earth>
Accept-Language: en-AU, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.2.120421
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <300E5211D6C3ED4F82FFBE3AFF501BC8@apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

Our CS management servers did end up at 100% CPU - MySQL and others were
fine. All the other CentOS boxes were OK, but we're now going to schedule
reboots to make sure.


-----Original Message-----
From: "<de Jong>", Mark-Jan <Mark-Jan.deJong@teoco.com>
Reply-To: "cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org"
<cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org>
Date: Tuesday, 3 July 2012 3:29 AM
To: "'cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org'"
<cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org>
Subject: RE: [leap second] Anyone else experiencing high rates of linux
server crashes today? - Server Fault

>http://remibergsma.wordpress.com/2012/07/01/high-cpu-load-on-cloudstack-ma
>nagement-servers-after-leap-second-3062012235959-utc/
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Tamas Monos [mailto:tamasm@veber.co.uk]
>> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 12:57 PM
>> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: [leap second] Anyone else experiencing high rates of linux
>> server crashes today? - Server Fault
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Same here! CentOS 6.2 freaked out, got a reboot My two CS managers had
>> so high loads I have never seen anything like that before (177).
>> At least I know the culprit :)
>> Thank you for the heads-up!!
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Tamas Monos                                               DDI
>> +44(0)2034687012
>> Chief Technical                                             Office
>> +44(0)2034687000
>> Veber: The Hosting Specialists               Fax         +44(0)871 522
>> 7057
>> http://www.veber.co.uk
>>
>> Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/veberhost Follow us on Facebook:
>> www.facebook.com/veberhost
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Caleb Call [mailto:calebcall@me.com]
>> Sent: 01 July 2012 20:28
>> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [leap second] Anyone else experiencing high rates of linux
>> server crashes today? - Server Fault
>>
>> You may want to verify your CentOS boxes atleast.  All of our CentOS
>> boxes that were 6 or higher (most were all 6.2) all survived but it
>> made them run at 100% CPU usage.  All of our 5.8 and below continued
>> humming along like nothing ever happened.
>>
>> On Jul 1, 2012, at 4:19 AM, James Kahn wrote:
>>
>> > Our CentOS 6.2 and Ubuntu 10.04 LTS boxes are fine, fortunately.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Chiradeep Vittal <Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com>
>> > Reply-To: "cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org"
>> > <cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org>
>> > Date: Sunday, 1 July 2012 7:50 AM
>> > To: CloudStack Users <cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org>
>> > Subject: [leap second] Anyone else experiencing high rates of linux
>> > server crashes today? - Server Fault
>> >
>> >> http://serverfault.com/questions/403732/anyone-else-experiencing-
>> high
>> >> -rate
>> >> s-of-linux-server-crashes-today
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Chiradeep
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>
>
>PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
>PLEASE NOTE: The information contained in this message is privileged and
>confidential, and is intended only for the use of the individual to whom
>it is addressed and others who have been specifically authorized to
>receive it. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
>notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
>communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
>communication in error, or if any problems occur with transmission,
>please contact sender. Thank you.
>
>Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.
>
>