Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CEBBFDA50 for ; Wed, 4 Jul 2012 03:47:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 15574 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2012 03:47:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 15550 invoked by uid 500); 4 Jul 2012 03:47:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 15533 invoked by uid 99); 4 Jul 2012 03:47:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 03:47:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of calebcall@me.com designates 17.158.236.242 as permitted sender) Received: from [17.158.236.242] (HELO nk11p04mm-asmtpout007.mac.com) (17.158.236.242) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 03:47:06 +0000 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Received: from [10.1.10.41] ([67.172.235.79]) by nk11p04mm-asmtp007.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-24.01(7.0.4.24.0) 64bit (built Jan 3 2012)) with ESMTPSA id <0M6M00BS1AHVCA20@nk11p04mm-asmtp007.mac.com> for cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org; Wed, 04 Jul 2012 03:46:44 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.7.7855,1.0.260,0.0.0000 definitions=2012-07-04_01:2012-07-03,2012-07-04,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=6.0.2-1203120001 definitions=main-1207030339 Subject: Re: Removing a Zone From: Caleb Call In-reply-to: <4C478694-02B7-4B72-BE79-D5770D6DB7E9@me.com> Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 21:46:41 -0600 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Message-id: References: <4C478694-02B7-4B72-BE79-D5770D6DB7E9@me.com> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278) On Jul 3, 2012, at 3:20 PM, Caleb Call wrote: >=20 > On Jul 3, 2012, at 3:10 PM, Ahmad Emneina wrote: >=20 >> On 7/3/12 1:50 PM, "Caleb Call" wrote: >>=20 >>> We're setting up a cloudstack install and one of our guys setup the = first >>> zone as a basic zone. We need the vlan support the advanced = provides so >>> we're trying so remove the basic zone and recreate an advanced one. >>> However, ever after removing system VMs, we are not able to remove = the >>> pod. We get an error that says "There are private IP addresses = allocated >>> for this pod". This isn't the case though (atleast not that we can = see). >>> Is there anyway to see where the IPs are supposedly being used, = and/or >>> forcibly remove this pod or zone? >>>=20 >>> Thanks, >>> Caleb >>>=20 >>=20 >> What you might want to do is disable the zone and set the various = process >> intervals for cleanup (found in the global settings section) to run = more >> often. The params you will want to change are the following: >> - expunge.interval >> - expunge.delay >> - network.gc.interval >> - network.gc.wait >>=20 >> These will require a service restart. I believe you have vm's that = have >> yet to be expunged. This will speed up the process. >>=20 >> --=20 >> =C6 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >=20 > Excellent, We'll give that a shot and see if that clears them up (I'm = assuming it will). Thanks >=20 > Thanks, > Caleb >=20 We applied these changes and we still get the same error. We changed = everything down to 1 sec and still no luck. We tried restarting the = service, nothing, we even rebooted the server with no luck. The odd = thing is the only VMs even built were the system VMs, we haven't even = attempted to build or spin-up any instances ourselves. Like I said, = we're still trying to get the networking piece configured properly. Are = there any other suggestions on what we could try? It wouldn't be a big = deal to just rebuild the management server but I'd like to figure this = out for when it's a prod machine and I have something like this crop up. Thanks, Caleb