Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE42B9875 for ; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 11:03:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 99200 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2012 11:03:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 98986 invoked by uid 500); 3 Jul 2012 11:03:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 98964 invoked by uid 99); 3 Jul 2012 11:03:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 11:03:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [203.166.19.134] (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM.AU) (203.166.19.134) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 03 Jul 2012 11:03:11 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,515,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="11927736" Received: from sydpmailmx02.citrite.net ([10.41.245.114]) by SYDPIPO01.CITRIX.COM.AU with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 03 Jul 2012 11:02:48 +0000 Received: from SYDPMAILBOX01.citrite.net ([10.40.1.111]) by SYDPMAILMX02.citrite.net ([10.41.245.114]) with mapi; Tue, 3 Jul 2012 21:02:48 +1000 From: Kimihiko Kitase To: "cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org" Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2012 21:03:03 +1000 Subject: RE: [leap second] Anyone else experiencing high rates of linux server crashes today? - Server Fault Thread-Topic: [leap second] Anyone else experiencing high rates of linux server crashes today? - Server Fault Thread-Index: Ac1XClec7JutEvQwRoKLOin5fHIScwAvHyoA///xooD//pnyQP/9KPCwgAasDYD//9eYEA== Message-ID: <82991E378735C54FBEDB9B4A5FED3B5F01B5E332CC71@SYDPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> References: <5E3DCAE61C95FA4397679425D7275D267352248FA5@HQ-MX03.us.teo.earth> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: ja-JP, en-US Content-Language: ja-JP X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: ja-JP, en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Is it caused even if management server use NTP? -----Original Message----- From: James Kahn [mailto:jkahn@idea11.com.au]=20 Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2012 7:38 AM To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [leap second] Anyone else experiencing high rates of linux ser= ver crashes today? - Server Fault Our CS management servers did end up at 100% CPU - MySQL and others were fi= ne. All the other CentOS boxes were OK, but we're now going to schedule reb= oots to make sure. -----Original Message----- From: "", Mark-Jan Reply-To: "cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org" Date: Tuesday, 3 July 2012 3:29 AM To: "'cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org'" Subject: RE: [leap second] Anyone else experiencing high rates of linux ser= ver crashes today? - Server Fault >http://remibergsma.wordpress.com/2012/07/01/high-cpu-load-on-cloudstack >-ma nagement-servers-after-leap-second-3062012235959-utc/ > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Tamas Monos [mailto:tamasm@veber.co.uk] >> Sent: Monday, July 02, 2012 12:57 PM >> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: RE: [leap second] Anyone else experiencing high rates of=20 >> linux server crashes today? - Server Fault >> >> Hi, >> >> Same here! CentOS 6.2 freaked out, got a reboot My two CS managers=20 >> had so high loads I have never seen anything like that before (177). >> At least I know the culprit :) >> Thank you for the heads-up!! >> >> Regards >> >> Tamas Monos DDI >> +44(0)2034687012 >> Chief Technical Office >> +44(0)2034687000 >> Veber: The Hosting Specialists Fax +44(0)871 522 >> 7057 >> http://www.veber.co.uk >> >> Follow us on Twitter: www.twitter.com/veberhost Follow us on Facebook: >> www.facebook.com/veberhost >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Caleb Call [mailto:calebcall@me.com] >> Sent: 01 July 2012 20:28 >> To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: [leap second] Anyone else experiencing high rates of=20 >> linux server crashes today? - Server Fault >> >> You may want to verify your CentOS boxes atleast. All of our CentOS=20 >> boxes that were 6 or higher (most were all 6.2) all survived but it=20 >> made them run at 100% CPU usage. All of our 5.8 and below continued=20 >> humming along like nothing ever happened. >> >> On Jul 1, 2012, at 4:19 AM, James Kahn wrote: >> >> > Our CentOS 6.2 and Ubuntu 10.04 LTS boxes are fine, fortunately. >> > >> > >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Chiradeep Vittal >> > Reply-To: "cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org" >> > >> > Date: Sunday, 1 July 2012 7:50 AM >> > To: CloudStack Users >> > Subject: [leap second] Anyone else experiencing high rates of linux=20 >> > server crashes today? - Server Fault >> > >> >> http://serverfault.com/questions/403732/anyone-else-experiencing- >> high >> >> -rate >> >> s-of-linux-server-crashes-today >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Chiradeep >> > >> > >> >> > > >PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL >PLEASE NOTE: The information contained in this message is privileged=20 >and confidential, and is intended only for the use of the individual to=20 >whom it is addressed and others who have been specifically authorized=20 >to receive it. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby=20 >notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this=20 >communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this=20 >communication in error, or if any problems occur with transmission,=20 >please contact sender. Thank you. > >Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. > >