Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7E03DDBDB for ; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 05:15:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 68970 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2012 05:15:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 68756 invoked by uid 500); 18 Jul 2012 05:15:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 68666 invoked by uid 99); 18 Jul 2012 05:15:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 05:15:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.3 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of Prasanna.Santhanam@citrix.com designates 203.166.19.134 as permitted sender) Received: from [203.166.19.134] (HELO SMTP.CITRIX.COM.AU) (203.166.19.134) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 05:15:38 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.77,606,1336348800"; d="scan'208";a="12073928" Received: from banpmailmx02.citrite.net ([10.103.128.74]) by SYDPIPO01.CITRIX.COM.AU with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 18 Jul 2012 05:15:06 +0000 Received: from citrix.com (10.146.0.130) by BANPMAILMX02.citrite.net (10.103.128.74) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.3.213.0; Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:45:04 +0530 Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 10:45:03 +0530 From: Prasanna Santhanam To: "cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org" Subject: Re: Inconsistency or Lack of Clarity between the two snapshots of VM status Message-ID: <20120718051503.GA12515@cloud.com> Mail-Followup-To: "cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org" References: <93099572B72EB341B81A644E134F240B012F6D0DB43F@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <93099572B72EB341B81A644E134F240B012F6D0DB43F@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 08:58:06PM -0400, Evan Miller wrote: > Please see the two attached snapshots. > > The dashboard view shows only one running VM, while the Instances view shows > two running VMs. If the Dashboard view intends to only show VMs for a particular > account, it should explicitly say that. If the Dashboard view is counting incorrectly, > then the Dashboard view should be fixed. > > In this case, one VM is supposed to be associated with one account in the domain. > And, another VM is supposed to be associated with another account in the same > domain. > The API call made by the dashboard view is a plain listVirtualMachines which will by default list only the VMs of that user - in your case that belonging to the domain admin. The Instances view is doing a listVirtualMachines with listAll=true therefore listing all VMs in that domain including those belong to the users in the domain. Hence the confusion. The domain admin dashboard UI needs to be fixed. Please file a bug report with these screenshots. This problem still exists on master branch. Thanks, -- Prasanna.,