Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 541AED580 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:21:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 90210 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2012 01:21:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 90156 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2012 01:21:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 90145 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2012 01:21:12 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:21:12 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_REPLY,HTML_MESSAGE,NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of spinolacastro@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.175] (HELO mail-ey0-f175.google.com) (209.85.215.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:21:07 +0000 Received: by eaal1 with SMTP id l1so619122eaa.6 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 18:20:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=vtwlYN0bYGRVSm6qjQ4EKojT/eRyn7JudTBbYcluL6M=; b=mttpvlSmm92ZkMsJ7pAGSPaiv45kIzQZiu3BCpV3Qm3ggTJXCyPTw6WGdYSderiMlk sAzRbmzu4+BpKFXlISkf55Qt1QS5eelPqaJuyqNfzflp9HREdv7zl9sCORQbGz1Ys8lt I0uE9PPmmhneCmnGCTjVwKaWOv3kDnH/3aLyuFEvgub29OuMCwA2yub1CPSVnX5zZGxa Pppjr1VEXy+BSxcNgmZ6EhNTizw4dahhrzJDRIZ9J9nZ2ZstdCR5YzFTbjB9FqmM5EAm pvjvJpZbw5tGi4ekKMnOx1FssLYi8iXSmMs7MBhn87Sw2veaXi0EWmD1l49a0eXEYYrb 8HqA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.39.5 with SMTP id c5mr5011eeb.42.1340846446086; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 18:20:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.224.66 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 18:20:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.224.66 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 18:20:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4FE8DEB8.9060001@citrix.com> <93099572B72EB341B81A644E134F240B012F6CABFC1C@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> <4FEAE285.6000309@pcextreme.nl> Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 22:20:45 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Ubuntu guest support status From: Diego Spinola Castro To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec52be5951e094b04c37e240c X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --bcaec52be5951e094b04c37e240c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Nice to hear. Take a look in kb for customizing systemvms and you will be able to apply it on every new vrouter. []'s Diego Castro Em 27/06/2012 18:39, "ronald higgins" escreveu: > Thanks all. > > I eventually blew away the deployment and jiggled the Virtual Router > and can the Ubuntu guest picks up the IP now. > Dropped this into the VR's rc.local (for future google searches): > > # Disable checksum offload using ethtool > ip addr sh | grep -P '^\d' | awk '/eth/ {print $2}' | tr -d ":" |while > read line > do > ethtool -K $line tx off > done > > Rebooted the VR and everything works 100's. > > Thanks All :) > > On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 4:10 PM, Diego Spinola Castro > wrote: > > This is a know issue of xenserver. Ethtool should workaround. I use xs > in a > > production and there are debian and ubuntu without troubles. > > > > []'s > > Diego Castro > > Em 27/06/2012 07:38, "Lennert den Teuling" > escreveu: > > > >> Op 27-06-12 08:31, ronald higgins schreef: > >> > >>> thanks all. > >>> > >>> still not having luck. > >>> > >>> if anyone has an Ubuntu 10.04 Server template that they're willing to > >>> share > >>> i would really appreciate it, being able to at least localize the issue > >>> will save my sanity. > >>> > >> > >> Hi Ronald, > >> > >> I read about this issue before, but never had any issues with obtaining > >> IPs in Debian or Ubuntu guests so didn't really looked in it. > >> > >> As i understand you are not able to get it working with any Debian based > >> OS. > >> > >> We currently run 2.2.14 in production and have some demo 3.x installs > and > >> all of our Debian based guests get their IP from the virtual router. > >> > >> I don't know if it's any different but we do use basic networking on > these > >> setups. As far i know, the same router VMs are used. We use KVM for all > >> these setups. > >> > >> We did not modify anything to the VMs, it are just basic installs from > >> recent ISOs. You can download a password enabled template we use from: > >> http://31.25.98.32/dump/**74ae6bd8-68c1-4667-af80-**7b39ea901980cow2< > http://31.25.98.32/dump/74ae6bd8-68c1-4667-af80-7b39ea901980cow2> > >> > >> Hope this helps! > >> > >> Lennert > >> > >> On 26 Jun 2012 21:20, "Diego Spinola Castro" > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Mike, try run command below on vrouter: > >>>> > >>>> /sbin/ethtool -K eth0 tx off > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> And refresh guest dhcp. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 2012/6/26 Michael Simos > >>>> > >>>> Check /var/log/messages for any errors. Also check > /var/log/dnsmasq.log > >>>>> > >>>> on > >>>> > >>>>> the virtual router. If you are using VLANs then it could be a problem > >>>>> > >>>> with > >>>> > >>>>> your L2 switch. > >>>>> > >>>>> Mike > >>>>> > >>>>> ______________________________**__________ > >>>>> From: ronald higgins [ronald.higgins@gmail.com] > >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 8:08 AM > >>>>> To: Michael Simos > >>>>> Cc: cloudstack-users@incubator.**apache.org< > cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org> > >>>>> Subject: Re: Ubuntu guest support status > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks for the suggestion Simon. > >>>>> > >>>>> Copied the dhclient binary off a Centos 5.7, coped it to /sbin/ on > the > >>>>> Ubuntu 10.04.4 box and created the links as described. Running the > >>>>> dhclient eth0 I can see that it's the RedHat version from the output > >>>>> but for some reason it's still not receiving DHCP offers from the VR: > >>>>> > >>>>> No DHCPOFFERS received. > >>>>> No working leases in persistent database - sleeping. > >>>>> > >>>>> Any thoughts? Not having any other DHCP related issues on other > O.S's :/ > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 11:57 PM, Mike Simos < > michael.simos@citrix.com> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Copy the dhclient binary from a CentOS 5.x system to /sbin. Then do: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> ln -s /var/lib/dhcp3 /var/lib/dhclient > >>>>>> dhclient eth0 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Mike > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On 06/25/2012 12:44 PM, ronald higgins wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi All, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I know that some time back there was an issue with Ubuntu VM's > failing > >>>>>>> to obtain a DHCP Address from the VR. > >>>>>>> What is the current status on that issue. I'm running into that > issue > >>>>>>> on a Ubuntu 10.04.4 deployment but see that on CS 3.0's release > note > >>>>>>> it seems to indicate this has been resolved? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> 11056 DHCP issues with Debian/Ubuntu guest OS have been resolved. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> If it's the case that it's still borked would a kind soul perhaps > >>>>>>> share how you got the VM to to obtain the IP and how you replaced > the > >>>>>>> stock isc-dhcp (dhcp3-client) ? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Regards > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Ronald > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > --bcaec52be5951e094b04c37e240c--