Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 444B89E2D for ; Tue, 29 May 2012 01:35:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 36032 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2012 01:35:24 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 36005 invoked by uid 500); 29 May 2012 01:35:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 35995 invoked by uid 99); 29 May 2012 01:35:24 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 May 2012 01:35:24 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of weiran.xia1@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.175 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.175] (HELO mail-ob0-f175.google.com) (209.85.214.175) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 29 May 2012 01:35:16 +0000 Received: by obhx4 with SMTP id x4so7179516obh.6 for ; Mon, 28 May 2012 18:34:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=sjU7fRuf15FCLmk9fdjGMxVQxDjuiBOiebueVoJMAtY=; b=jZYssDQR1eXZP8kIL5Mxh5s7p21+rt4hCgZVqID1Dwm+9EHEC0P3UZqwt1BoAJSkDv q6NLZh9LaPXVQehXTR1Ky89UwAoM19E/MnrrF7KiWLvM2HUu4HETIGLZB9b9Seq5xdcx Dt3DpzUrBQuUgM7++EcNBOJFVdY2LnFA423GXvJMqEk2UCmagLca4eFAHXVHoeSs3KQi C3StJaev7HgjsxdvP+C5FK+zwcjvfy/Wf19uRxBmtHjj7MGr4WFO9PF27TcTv06yYUx9 IY1zfhWuO2cn2lOMSCf1/HgAkFI8frDTcdlU/JPUlj2bZb88PdzljN+tjM90/TLbpshn jmdg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.167.101 with SMTP id zn5mr9719324obb.13.1338255295651; Mon, 28 May 2012 18:34:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.151.10 with HTTP; Mon, 28 May 2012 18:34:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <64FB1554ABC9B44FAA773FBD6CB889C2F93A9CEE3E@BANPMAILBOX01.citrite.net> Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 09:34:55 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: About cloudstack error messages From: Weiran Xia To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e89a8f83a703841f7704c122d7ab --e89a8f83a703841f7704c122d7ab Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Nitin, Thanks for your reply. It might not be a particular case. From soruce code, indeed, cloudstack map exception to errorcode, but the error message returned from UI/API is not fine-grained enough to help users narrow down the reason, Now there are about 60 exceptions, which map to 60 errorcode. Does one exception always come up with the same error message (or message format), or it depends on the code which throws it? Regards Mice --e89a8f83a703841f7704c122d7ab--