cloudstack-marketing mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Erik Weber <terbol...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: OpenStack Revenues Approaching $3.4B: 451 Research
Date Thu, 28 Apr 2016 16:26:09 GMT
Depending on the upgrade, it can take anywhere from a few minutes to a few
hours to upgrade cloudstack.

HP stopped providing its public openstack cloud..

Erik

Den torsdag 28. april 2016 skrev Yim, Philip <Philip_Yim@alliedtelesis.com>
følgende:

> I'm new to the thread but does cloudstack solve this problem ?
>
> Philip
>
>
> On Apr 28, 2016, at 8:36 AM, Will Stevens <williamstevens@gmail.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','williamstevens@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>
> I would be curious to know how many billions of $ of consulting and
> operational costs were incurred to boost the $3.4B of revenues.  :)  I
> wonder which number is bigger...
>
> You still can't upgrade an openstack cloud, so if you want to go to a new
> version, you have to build a new cloud and migrate all of your workloads.
>
> I am not saying you can't make money with openstack, but I would rather be
> an openstack consultant than an openstack provider, and that says a lot
> about the actual technology...
>
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 11:07 AM, Sunando Bhattacharya <
> sunando@indiqus.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','sunando@indiqus.com');>>
> wrote:
>
>> I really don’t know on what basis we are saying that openstack doesn’t
>> work… $3.4Bill of revenues !!!
>>
>> Fact is openstack is production-grade and catching up fast on most counts
>> with ACS, and actually ahead on some features like NFV.
>>
>> Lets call a spade a spade
>>
>> *Sunando Bhattacharya*
>> *M* +91 97111 52299
>> www.indiqus.com
>>
>> <https://www.indiqus.com/blog>
>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/indiqus-technologies-pvt-ltd->
>> <https://twitter.com/INDIQUS>
>> <https://plus.google.com/+Indiqus_technologies/about>
>> <https://www.facebook.com/indiqus>
>>
>>
>> *This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to
>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential
>> and/or privileged. If you are not the intended recipient please delete the
>> original message and any copy of it from your computer system. You are
>> hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this
>> communication is strictly prohibited unless proper authorization has been
>> obtained for such action. If you have received this communication in error,
>> please notify the sender immediately. Although IndiQus attempts to sweep
>> e-mail and attachments for viruses, it does not guarantee that both are
>> virus-free and accepts no liability for any damage sustained as a result of
>> viruses.*
>>
>> On 28 April 2016 at 8:26:21 PM, Giles Sirett (giles.sirett@shapeblue.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','giles.sirett@shapeblue.com');>) wrote:
>>
>> +1 to that will
>>
>> Kind Regards
>>
>> Giles
>>
>>
>>
>> D: +44 20 3603 0541 <+44%2020%203603%200541> | M: +44 796 111 2055
>> <+44%20796%20111%202055>
>>
>> Giles.Sirett@shapeblue.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','giles.sirett@shapeblue.com');>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> giles.sirett@shapeblue.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','giles.sirett@shapeblue.com');>
>> www.shapeblue.com
>> @shapeblue
>>
>> On 28 Apr 2016, at 15:39, Will Stevens <williamstevens@gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','williamstevens@gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>
>> Openstack is just bitter because they still don't have a product that
>> works and our product works just fine.  Just goes to show that more money
>> doesn't always solve the problem...  :)  All that money and almost no
>> success stories.  Kind of sad really...
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 1:09 AM, Madan Ganesh Velayudham <
>> madanganesh@actonmagic.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','madanganesh@actonmagic.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> Just bumped onto this article, thought of sharing:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://www.eweek.com/cloud/openstack-revenues-approaching-3.4b-451-research.html
>>>
>>> <snip>
>>> The decision to turn over OpenStack to a foundation in 2012 stands in
>>> contrast to the CloudStack platform and its parent, Citrix. Citrix
>>> donated
>>> <http://www.serverwatch.com/server-news/citrix-walks-away-from-openstack-moves-to-apache-cloudstack.html>
>>> CloudStack to the Apache Software Foundation, but it was never set up with
>>> the same true, multi-stakeholder, stand-alone foundation as OpenStack's.
>>>
>>> "If Citrix would have done a foundation around CloudStack, *we would
>>> now be at a Cloudstack Summit, not OpenStack Summit*," Sadowski said."
>>> Sadowski said.
>>> <snip>
>>>
>>> The bold highlighted line was hurting a little bit!
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Madan
>>>
>>> --
>>> Madan Ganesh Velayudham
>>> Founder & CEO
>>> ActOnMagic
>>>
>>> *Cloud Governance, Analytics, Management Simplified with ActOnCloud!*
>>> www.actonmagic.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
> ------------------------------
> This e-mail message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and
> may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized
> review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
> all copies of the original message. If you are the intended recipient,
> please be advised that the content of this message is subject to access,
> review and disclosure by the sender's e-mail System Administrator.
>

Mime
View raw message