cloudstack-marketing mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "White, Kim" <>
Subject RE: Latest Blog Post
Date Tue, 03 Feb 2015 16:44:17 GMT
Disclaimer - Opinions my own -- I do not represent NetApp.

It looks like we are picking on one marketing piece rather than looking at the big picture.

Yes -- the piece could have served the community better with references to the dev team and
The community membership can help make that tie in happen when we promote it.

I can see the community leadership position about promoting commercial interests.
Those of us not in that position can be much more free and less constrained.

Make no mistake -- the big picture is offering the world a viable community alternative to
"pay to play" OpenStack.
Commercial credibility comes from the logos and support of the companies that deploy and bet
their business on the SW.
Is splitting the hairs around the Citrix commercialization of SW distribution & support
really in conflict with the mission of the CloudStack community & the Apache Way?

Kim White
408.822.3125 Direct
925.998.4252 Mobile

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Hinkle [] 
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 5:41 AM
Subject: Re: Latest Blog Post

> On Feb 3, 2015, at 12:28 AM, Rohit Yadav <> wrote:
>> On 03-Feb-2015, at 10:04 am, Mark Hinkle <> wrote:
>> I was on the road and asked Karen to do create some tweets especially since this
blog was partially in response to lat months’s thread about Citrix not supporting CloudStack.
I thought we promoted any success based on CloudStack whether it’s a proprietary fork, storage
solution or other tool. I’d be lying if I didn’t have an opinion but would be curious
to see how many people agree with Rohit. If there’s a majority opinion I’d support whatever
the group wants. It seems the phrase “Damned if we do, Damned if we don’t” applies.
> The blog talks about CCP and does not talk anything about ACS - the project or its community.
The blog still has a “powered by Apache CloudStack” sticker but should we promoting anything
with such stickers? I would be happy if it still could be edited to add a link to the project
and add a line or two like all past successes (proprietary forks or tools or solutions) have
> Regards,
> Rohit Yadav
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> M. +91 88 262 30892 |
> Blog: | Twitter: @_bhaisaab
> Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
> IaaS Cloud Design & Build<>
> CSForge – rapid IaaS deployment framework<>
> CloudStack Consulting<>
> CloudStack Software Engineering<>
> CloudStack Infrastructure Support<>
> CloudStack Bootcamp Training Courses<>
> This email and any attachments to it may be confidential and are intended solely for
the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. Any views or opinions expressed are solely
those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Shape Blue Ltd or related companies.
If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you must neither take any action based
upon its contents, nor copy or show it to anyone. Please contact the sender if you believe
you have received this email in error. Shape Blue Ltd is a company incorporated in England
& Wales. ShapeBlue Services India LLP is a company incorporated in India and is operated
under license from Shape Blue Ltd. Shape Blue Brasil Consultoria Ltda is a company incorporated
in Brasil and is operated under license from Shape Blue Ltd. ShapeBlue SA Pty Ltd is a company
registered by The Republic of South Africa and is traded under license from Shape Blue Ltd.
ShapeBlue is a registered trademark.

It’s a corporate blog and Steve would probably edit it  to appease this group but I’d
never in my wildest dreams  ask any other supporter of the project to edit their blogs to
our editorial guidelines. Given your strong opinions and my extreme frustration with his topic
and thread  I’d highly recommend that it not be tweeted. 


View raw message