cloudstack-marketing mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Laszlo Hornyak <laszlo.horn...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo for CloudStack
Date Mon, 03 Feb 2014 22:08:13 GMT
Hi, some of the latest design ideas. Feel free to reuse (as far as it is ok
with the trademark)


On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:37 PM, Laszlo Hornyak <laszlo.hornyak@gmail.com>wrote:

> I want to avoid having an overlay on the image, so I will return to my
> previous design and fix that. Guys if you want the monkey, now you have a
> very easy job :-)
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Yes Kirk, that would help. That or a scale down of the cloud and
>> monkey in comparison to the letters. (I have no problem with any of
>> our fellow primates)
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 12:11 AM, Kirk Jantzer <kirk.jantzer@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Daan - agreed about the balance, however disagree about the monkey. I
>> think
>> > if the text was a layer over the cloud, it might be more balanced, like
>> > this: http://i.imgur.com/WTNAIoG.png (not the same font or text, but
>> the
>> > idea)
>> >
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Kirk Jantzer
>> > http://about.me/kirkjantzer
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> I actually don't like the cute creature in there. from a graphical
>> >> stance; it ruins the balance in the logo, hanging out on the top
>> >> right. maybe because of the form factor. maybe you can try one without
>> >> the monkey and one cut in which the centre of the picture is between
>> >> the base of the monkey tail and the start of the cloud.
>> >>
>> >> sorry to nag,
>> >> Daan
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Laszlo Hornyak
>> >> <laszlo.hornyak@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> > Hi,
>> >> >
>> >> > Sending version 0.0.3:
>> >> > - Complete monkey added
>> >> > - "Apache" added
>> >> > - Clouds more like the original logo
>> >> > This also comes with some cons:
>> >> > - 4 colors
>> >> > - lots of text, at least compared to 0.0.1
>> >> > but if you look at it scaled down to very small, it is still
>> readable,
>> >> even
>> >> > the monkey is so-so.
>> >> >
>> >> > Just in case someone feels like experimenting, I also attached the
>> up to
>> >> > date version of my reverse engineered cloudstack monkey with cloud.
>> >> >
>> >> > steroidmonkey is just a bit different from the poweredbycloudstack
>> svg,
>> >> spot
>> >> > the difference :-)
>> >> >
>> >> > Your feedback is welcome!
>> >> >
>> >> > Thank you,
>> >> > Laszlo
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Daan Hoogland <
>> daan.hoogland@gmail.com>
>> >> > wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I like,
>> >> >> 2. But I agree with Rbyn about the word apache. I should be in
>> there.
>> >> >> I think it must even.
>> >> >> 1. It looks streched on my preview in finder as well
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:47 PM, Robyn Bergeron <rbergero@redhat.com
>> >
>> >> >> wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > ----- Original Message -----
>> >> >> >> From: "Laszlo Hornyak" <laszlo.hornyak@gmail.com>
>> >> >> >> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> >> >> >> Cc: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org
>> >> >> >> Sent: Sunday, December 1, 2013 10:31:11 AM
>> >> >> >> Subject: Re: Request: Help designing a 'powered by' logo
for
>> >> CloudStack
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Here is my version:
>> >> >> >>  - SVG format as you requested
>> >> >> >>  - Only two colors, exactly the same as for the original
logo. I
>> >> prefer
>> >> >> >> few
>> >> >> >> colors for such pictures
>> >> >> >>  - Unfortunately the monkey could not make it, the whole
thing
>> needs
>> >> to
>> >> >> >> fit
>> >> >> >> into a very small area and the monkey would be too little
detail
>> (the
>> >> >> >> monkey is ├╝bercool anyway)
>> >> >> >>  - if no monkey, then cloud
>> >> >> >>  - only "powered by cloudstack", no extra text because
it make
>> make
>> >> >> >> difficult to read in such a small place
>> >> >> >>  - see attached file :)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Hi,
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > I like the cloud idea/placement. (And totally get that it's
going
>> to
>> >> be
>> >> >> > hard to see the monkey in such a small space. Even though
he's so
>> >> cute.)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Two things -
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > 1) The lettering in the word "cloudstack" looks stretched
as
>> compared
>> >> >> > with the normal look of the font - I'm not sure if that's
>> >> intentional, not
>> >> >> > intentional, something really weird in how it's rendering
on my
>> >> screen... :)
>> >> >> > 2) I realize the problem around "no extra text" but ... do
we
>> want to
>> >> >> > add in the word apache? (or conversely, is there any reason
why it
>> >> shouldn't
>> >> >> > be added in... legal, etc)?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > -robyn
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 6:56 PM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us>
>> wrote:
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> > Hi folks:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > If you happen to have some graphical design talent
(I have
>> none) I
>> >> >> >> > have a great opportunity for you :)
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > CloudStack needs a 'powered by' logo that is easy
to consume,
>> and
>> >> is
>> >> >> >> > also attractive.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > A couple examples of powered by logos:
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > http://tomcat.apache.org/images/tomcat-power.gif
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/download/attachments/80899/mahout-logo-poweredby-100.png?version=1&modificationDate=1312880703000
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >>
>> https://netbeans.org/images_www/screenshots/6.0/baseIDE_ant_powered_150px.png
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > A couple of constraints:
>> >> >> >> > * Please don't use the Apache feather. (we could,
but lets
>> not; it
>> >> >> >> > will make life simpler)
>> >> >> >> > * Please try and produce a vector format as source
(this
>> allows us
>> >> to
>> >> >> >> > scale/etc)
>> >> >> >> > * Because this will become a trademark (which is
vastly
>> different
>> >> >> >> > that
>> >> >> >> > copyright) - we will likely need some explicit email
agreement
>> >> around
>> >> >> >> > trademarks rights for the image. (I promise, it isn't
as scary
>> as
>> >> >> >> > that
>> >> >> >> > sentence makes it out to be.)
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Anyone interested?
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > --David
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> --
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> EOF
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> >
>> >> > EOF
>> >>
>>
>
>
>
> --
>
> EOF
>



-- 

EOF

Mime
View raw message