Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-marketing-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-marketing-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FF83C082 for ; Fri, 1 Nov 2013 09:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54546 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2013 09:21:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-marketing-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 54384 invoked by uid 500); 1 Nov 2013 09:21:08 -0000 Mailing-List: contact marketing-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list marketing@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 54376 invoked by uid 99); 1 Nov 2013 09:21:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 09:21:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of runseb@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.47] (HELO mail-ee0-f47.google.com) (74.125.83.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 09:20:58 +0000 Received: by mail-ee0-f47.google.com with SMTP id c13so1872056eek.34 for ; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 02:20:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=HaggdGYoOHWfzPksu0FYg476+AwHJYZMtEhI7zLHPQs=; b=c4lFRSOnPzZvTvusJGlNBHQ6kAMpEl6a7vrhL4OHFIpVygUZ4ql3YN1LfzTGvPx4v5 dlADyfFXOcOnwG8+Gs14U2zmrmZEC2kD0ug3pQ5aAYGybQNY6ED2gYu5fXYjVEjxQxP9 FHM1iCqWdVakCw10V+LZWG0PTszX+0FYw4mz0bDU80pjLHM/SQaJO7cs0aH2na3AAh7Q MUSxYv9Q+ZsP2euQ7nIwahGoP1iU5BNVBC6RiDhMpMRr89F9M9X2FvRefG19QfMD2JL1 H05wXddLDIwklADirlCVWIzYe9AxR4Ib77F/qRABTa49dYpWYh9gYrwjuCYLtk1NDAWT 8COA== X-Received: by 10.14.180.73 with SMTP id i49mr1946057eem.55.1383297638057; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 02:20:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.0.0.3] (128-228.193-178.cust.bluewin.ch. [178.193.228.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b42sm5284999eem.9.2013.11.01.02.20.36 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 01 Nov 2013 02:20:37 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\)) Subject: Re: CloudStack in numbers From: Sebastien Goasguen In-Reply-To: <20131031154907.GF1390@Chips-MacBook-Air.local> Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 05:20:38 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <50E9494F90A78445AE57FE37D38ABE5549BF19@ikhexmbx08-n1.ikhex.ikoula.com> <20131031154907.GF1390@Chips-MacBook-Air.local> To: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org, Anne Claire Pourchasse X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1503) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Anne-Claire, To keep things simple, you can refer to Ohloh: https://www.ohloh.net/p/CloudStack This will give you: 4.2 Million line of code 169 contributors ~500 commits/month ~50 contributors/month To that you can add: 71 apache committers (from http://cloudstack.apache.org/who.html ) =46rom a survey we ran you can add: 275 production clouds (public or private) =46rom stats of our package repository: 109 countries=20 ~20,000 unique IP downloads =46rom our mailing lists: ~150 contributors a month on both users@ and dev@ ~60 companies a month (from email domains) if you do some accumulation: ~1100 people participated on the mailing lists to date ~400 companies to date All this data is public (but I wrote bunch of scripts to get the final = numbers=85), and of course it is subject to many caveats and = interpretation. -Sebastien On Oct 31, 2013, at 11:49 AM, Chip Childers = wrote: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 04:19:17PM +0000, Kelly Hair wrote: >> Chip & Giles, >>=20 >> Recall you guys were working on something on this front. Did that = survey >> go out, and if so, have the results been tabulated & reported on? >>=20 >> Best, >> Kelly >=20 > The survey was done, but the summary info would be nice to have. >=20 > However, a number of the details being requested below aren't actually > things we can / should track. >=20 > That being said, we do have some data that can be visualized (example: > sebgoa did some cool unique IP map images for package downloads). >=20 > We should pick this thread up shortly... it's good marketing material > for the project. >=20 > -chip