Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-cloudstack-marketing-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-marketing-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3BEC810ADE for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:16:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 12442 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2013 15:16:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-cloudstack-marketing-archive@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 12283 invoked by uid 500); 15 Nov 2013 15:16:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact marketing-help@cloudstack.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: marketing@cloudstack.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list marketing@cloudstack.apache.org Received: (qmail 12273 invoked by uid 99); 15 Nov 2013 15:16:17 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:16:17 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of Kim.White@netapp.com designates 216.240.18.76 as permitted sender) Received: from [216.240.18.76] (HELO mx11.netapp.com) (216.240.18.76) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:16:12 +0000 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,708,1378882800"; d="scan'208";a="75415286" Received: from vmwexceht01-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.239]) by mx11-out.netapp.com with ESMTP; 15 Nov 2013 07:15:50 -0800 Received: from SACEXCMBX03-PRD.hq.netapp.com ([169.254.5.236]) by vmwexceht01-prd.hq.netapp.com ([10.106.76.239]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 07:09:39 -0800 From: "White, Kim" To: Chip Childers CC: "trademarks@apache.org" , "McDonald, Rob" , "susan.wu@citrix.com" , "marketing@cloudstack.apache.org" Subject: Re: Name approval request - NetApp Virtual Storage Console for CloudStack Thread-Topic: Name approval request - NetApp Virtual Storage Console for CloudStack Thread-Index: Ac7gjLgb0mU75R8ZTPS8Mrz7wrYCUwASiNeAAF2meoAAAIdOgP//ij4m Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:09:35 +0000 Message-ID: <7D559932-3012-46B6-8E89-5C242D989F8E@netapp.com> References: <39FE276158DB2647B46E22535CA8146530CD1441@SACEXCMBX03-PRD.hq.netapp.com> <20131113171425.GK36972@Chips-MacBook-Air.local> <528627EB.1050706@shanecurcuru.org>,<20131115141103.GE36972@Chips-MacBook-Air.local> In-Reply-To: <20131115141103.GE36972@Chips-MacBook-Air.local> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Thank you for the quick response. Kim Sent from my iPhone On Nov 15, 2013, at 6:11 AM, "Chip Childers" wrot= e: > On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 08:55:55AM -0500, Shane Curcuru wrote: >> Please see our FAQ for software product names using Apache brands: >>=20 >> http://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/faq/#poweredby >>=20 >> Note that alternate separator phrases besides "Powered By" are >> acceptable when the meaning of the phrase (or word) is clear from >> the context of the specific relationship between a third party's >> software product and the Apache product. >>=20 >> I'm not familiar with the CloudStack plugin model, but if Chip and >> the CloudStack PMC are happy with the name in terms of how "for" >> clearly fits within how plugins are developed and used, then it's >> fine with me. >=20 > "for" seems like a very reasonable separator to me. I'm +1 on this. >=20 >>=20 >> Note: as Chip notes, the use of the full "Apache CloudStack" name is >> required. >>=20 >> - Shane Curcuru >> VP, Brand Management >> The Apache Software Foundation